PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACWX vs. IXUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACWX vs. IXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ACWX having a 14.30% return and IXUS slightly higher at 14.51%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ACWX having a 9.57% annualized return and IXUS not far ahead at 9.78%.


ACWX

1D
-1.06%
1M
5.24%
YTD
14.30%
6M
17.01%
1Y
32.04%
3Y*
19.35%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
9.57%

IXUS

1D
-1.01%
1M
4.91%
YTD
14.51%
6M
17.16%
1Y
32.15%
3Y*
19.44%
5Y*
8.38%
10Y*
9.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWX vs. IXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
14.30%32.59%5.17%15.63%-16.07%7.67%10.29%21.05%-13.99%27.20%
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
14.51%32.40%5.19%15.83%-16.47%8.86%10.80%21.71%-14.41%28.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWX and IXUS is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012

0.99

The correlation between ACWX and IXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

ACWX vs. IXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ACWX
IXUS

Financial Services

23.3%
22.4%

Technology

22.4%
18.0%

Industrials

14.0%
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
8.3%

Healthcare

6.7%
7.1%

Basic Materials

6.7%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
5.1%

Energy

4.8%
5.2%

Communication Services

4.7%
4.8%

Utilities

2.8%
3.2%

Real Estate

1.2%
2.5%

Financial Services

ACWX
23.3%
IXUS
22.4%

Technology

ACWX
22.4%
IXUS
18.0%

Industrials

ACWX
14.0%
IXUS
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

ACWX
7.3%
IXUS
8.3%

Healthcare

ACWX
6.7%
IXUS
7.1%

Basic Materials

ACWX
6.7%
IXUS
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

ACWX
5.0%
IXUS
5.1%

Energy

ACWX
4.8%
IXUS
5.2%

Communication Services

ACWX
4.7%
IXUS
4.8%

Utilities

ACWX
2.8%
IXUS
3.2%

Real Estate

ACWX
1.2%
IXUS
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACWX vs. IXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWX
ACWX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
ACWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

IXUS
IXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWX vs. IXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACWXIXUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.39

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

2.84

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.96

11.13

-0.17

ACWX vs. IXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the IXUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWX and IXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACWXIXUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

2.10

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.52

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.57

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.49

-0.26

Drawdowns

ACWX vs. IXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWX drawdown since its inception was -60.40%, which is greater than IXUS's maximum drawdown of -36.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWX and IXUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACWXIXUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.40%

-36.22%

-24.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.42%

-11.36%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.84%

-13.75%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.07%

-30.04%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.38%

-36.22%

+0.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-1.01%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.34%

-7.50%

-5.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

2.90%

+0.03%

Volatility

ACWX vs. IXUS - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) have volatilities of 5.74% and 5.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACWXIXUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.74%

5.64%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.26%

13.16%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.51%

15.37%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.29%

16.21%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.38%

17.07%

+0.31%

ACWX vs. IXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than IXUS's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACWX vs. IXUS - Dividend Comparison

ACWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, less than IXUS's 2.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
2.47%2.82%2.97%2.96%2.68%2.74%1.88%3.22%2.60%2.40%2.77%2.51%
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
2.83%3.24%3.33%3.13%2.48%3.12%1.85%3.09%3.00%2.41%2.58%2.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, ACWX and IXUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ACWX has higher volatility (5.74%) compared to IXUS (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWX dropped -60.40% vs IXUS's -36.22%.

On 10-year performance, IXUS leads with 9.78% vs 9.57% for ACWX. On fees, IXUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IXUS has been the lower-risk option at 5.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IXUS has performed better with a 9.78% return vs 9.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWX.

IXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 2.47% for ACWX.

ACWX tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index, while IXUS tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ACWX and 0.07% for IXUS.

IXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACWX and IXUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer