IWF vs. VONG

Last updated Jul 31, 2026

IWF (iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF) and VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index, from iShares and Vanguard respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWF returned 17.12%/yr vs 17.26%/yr for VONG. Their 0.98 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. IWF charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VONG.

Performance

IWF vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWF achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly lower than VONG's -0.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWF having a 17.12% annualized return and VONG not far ahead at 17.26%.

IWF

• 1D: 2.96%
• 1M: -5.43%
• 6M: 0.24%
• YTD: -0.58%
• 1Y: 7.10%
• 3Y*: 18.75%
• 5Y*: 11.51%
• 10Y*: 17.12%
• ALL TIME*: 8.19%

VONG

• 1D: 2.96%
• 1M: -5.41%
• 6M: 0.34%
• YTD: -0.45%
• 1Y: 7.22%
• 3Y*: 18.88%
• 5Y*: 11.65%
• 10Y*: 17.26%
• ALL TIME*: 16.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF	$612.04M	$598.78M	$645.39M
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	$176.67M	$149.12M	$175.82M

IWF vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF	-0.58%	18.33%	33.12%	42.59%	-29.31%	27.43%	38.25%	35.86%	-1.67%	29.95%
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	-0.45%	18.45%	33.20%	42.67%	-29.18%	27.60%	38.30%	36.06%	-1.53%	30.05%

Correlation

The correlation between IWF and VONG is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	1.00
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	1.00
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010	0.98

The correlation between IWF and VONG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWF vs. VONG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IWF	VONG
Technology	54.2%	54.3%
Communication Services	16.2%	16.2%
Industrials	9.0%	9.0%
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	8.4%
Healthcare	5.4%	5.4%
Financial Services	4.3%	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	1.2%	1.2%
Energy	0.5%	0.5%
Real Estate	0.4%	0.4%
Utilities	0.3%	0.3%
Basic Materials	0.3%	0.3%

Return for Risk

IWF vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IWF

IWF Risk / Return Rank: 20
IWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
IWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
IWF Omega Ratio Rank: 19
IWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
IWF Martin Ratio Rank: 20

VONG

VONG Risk / Return Rank: 20
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 20
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IWF vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWF	VONG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.41	0.42	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.68	0.69	-0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.08	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.44	0.45	-0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.31	1.34	-0.03

IWF vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWF Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is comparable to the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWF and VONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IWF vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWF drawdown since its inception was -64.25%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWF and VONG.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWF	VONG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.25%	-32.72%	-31.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.27%	-16.23%	-0.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.36%	-23.27%	-0.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.72%	-32.72%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.72%	-32.72%	0.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.73%	-8.65%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.98%	-4.89%	-17.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.43%	5.40%	+0.03%

Volatility

IWF vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) have volatilities of 6.46% and 6.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWF	VONG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.46%	6.41%	+0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.05%	14.00%	+0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.48%	17.43%	+0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.71%	21.65%	+0.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.10%	21.01%	+0.09%

IWF vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWF has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IWF vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

IWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than VONG's 0.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF	0.37%	0.36%	0.46%	0.67%	0.91%	0.49%	0.66%	0.99%	1.27%	1.10%	1.43%	1.37%
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	0.48%	0.45%	0.55%	0.71%	0.98%	0.58%	0.77%	1.03%	1.18%	1.19%	1.48%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWF and VONG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, IWF and VONG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, IWF or VONG?

IWF has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to VONG (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWF dropped -64.25% vs VONG's -32.72%.

Which ETF is better, IWF or VONG?

On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 17.26% vs 17.12% for IWF. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IWF or VONG?

Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 17.26% return vs 17.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWF or VONG?

VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IWF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWF or VONG?

VONG has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.37% for IWF.

What is the main difference between IWF and VONG?

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IWF and 0.06% for VONG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VONG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.