PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IWF vs. IWD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IWF and IWD is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

IWF vs. IWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

450.00%500.00%550.00%600.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
578.33%
499.17%
IWF
IWD

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IWF:

1.96

IWD:

1.85

Sortino Ratio

IWF:

2.56

IWD:

2.60

Omega Ratio

IWF:

1.35

IWD:

1.33

Calmar Ratio

IWF:

2.61

IWD:

2.63

Martin Ratio

IWF:

9.94

IWD:

8.04

Ulcer Index

IWF:

3.49%

IWD:

2.56%

Daily Std Dev

IWF:

17.67%

IWD:

11.12%

Max Drawdown

IWF:

-64.18%

IWD:

-60.10%

Current Drawdown

IWF:

-2.76%

IWD:

-3.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWF achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly lower than IWD's 3.43% return. Over the past 10 years, IWF has outperformed IWD with an annualized return of 16.85%, while IWD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.87% annualized return.


IWF

YTD

1.34%

1M

0.99%

6M

12.80%

1Y

31.00%

5Y*

18.00%

10Y*

16.85%

IWD

YTD

3.43%

1M

4.50%

6M

7.60%

1Y

19.14%

5Y*

8.96%

10Y*

8.87%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IWF vs. IWD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IWF and IWD have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Expense ratio chart for IWF: current value at 0.19% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.19%
Expense ratio chart for IWD: current value at 0.19% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.19%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IWF vs. IWD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IWF is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IWF is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IWF is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IWF is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IWF is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IWF is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

IWD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IWD is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IWD is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IWD is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IWD is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IWD is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IWD is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IWF vs. IWD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IWF, currently valued at 1.96, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.961.85
The chart of Sortino ratio for IWF, currently valued at 2.56, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.562.60
The chart of Omega ratio for IWF, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.351.33
The chart of Calmar ratio for IWF, currently valued at 2.61, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.612.63
The chart of Martin ratio for IWF, currently valued at 9.94, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.009.948.04
IWF
IWD

The current IWF Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the IWD Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWF and IWD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.96
1.85
IWF
IWD

Dividends

IWF vs. IWD - Dividend Comparison

IWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than IWD's 1.81% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.45%0.46%0.67%0.91%0.50%0.66%0.99%1.27%1.10%1.43%1.37%1.33%
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
1.81%1.88%2.02%2.15%1.62%2.05%2.45%2.71%2.09%2.25%2.47%2.00%

Drawdowns

IWF vs. IWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWF drawdown since its inception was -64.18%, which is greater than IWD's maximum drawdown of -60.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWF and IWD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-2.76%
-3.67%
IWF
IWD

Volatility

IWF vs. IWD - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) has a higher volatility of 6.34% compared to iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) at 4.38%. This indicates that IWF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
6.34%
4.38%
IWF
IWD
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab