ACWX vs. IWV
ACWX (iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF) and IWV (iShares Russell 3000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACWX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index, while IWV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 3000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACWX returned 10.06%/yr vs 14.98%/yr for IWV. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACWX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IWV.
Performance
ACWX vs. IWV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACWX achieves a 12.88% return, which is significantly higher than IWV's 8.58% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWX has underperformed IWV with an annualized return of 10.06%, while IWV has yielded a comparatively higher 14.98% annualized return.
ACWX
- 1D
- -3.17%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 12.88%
- 6M
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 29.85%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- 10.06%
IWV
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- 8.58%
- 6M
- 7.48%
- 1Y
- 23.69%
- 3Y*
- 20.38%
- 5Y*
- 11.79%
- 10Y*
- 14.98%
ACWX vs. IWV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 12.88% | 32.59% | 5.17% | 15.63% | -16.07% | 7.67% | 10.29% | 21.05% | -13.99% | 27.20% |
IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF | 8.58% | 16.96% | 23.49% | 25.82% | -19.28% | 25.54% | 20.55% | 30.66% | -5.43% | 20.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACWX and IWV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2008 | 0.83 |
The correlation between ACWX and IWV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
ACWX vs. IWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACWX
IWV
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
ACWX
IWV
Financial Services
ACWX
IWV
Industrials
ACWX
IWV
Consumer Cyclical
ACWX
IWV
Basic Materials
ACWX
IWV
Healthcare
ACWX
IWV
Consumer Defensive
ACWX
IWV
Communication Services
ACWX
IWV
Energy
ACWX
IWV
Utilities
ACWX
IWV
Real Estate
ACWX
IWV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACWX vs. IWV — Risk / Return Rank
ACWX
IWV
ACWX vs. IWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACWX | IWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.34 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 2.68 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.05 | 11.92 | -1.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACWX vs. IWV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWX drawdown since its inception was -60.40%, which is greater than IWV's maximum drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWX and IWV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACWX | IWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.40% | -55.61% | -4.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.42% | -8.89% | -2.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.84% | -19.28% | +5.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.78% | -25.11% | -4.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.38% | -35.22% | -0.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.17% | -2.74% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.30% | -10.57% | -2.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 1.99% | +0.99% |
Volatility
ACWX vs. IWV - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) has a higher volatility of 7.37% compared to iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) at 4.84%. This indicates that ACWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACWX | IWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.37% | 4.84% | +2.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.77% | 9.97% | +4.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.74% | 12.72% | +4.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 17.33% | -0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 18.41% | -1.14% |
ACWX vs. IWV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than IWV's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACWX vs. IWV - Dividend Comparison
ACWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than IWV's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 2.54% | 2.82% | 2.97% | 2.96% | 2.68% | 2.74% | 1.88% | 3.22% | 2.60% | 2.40% | 2.77% | 2.51% |
IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF | 0.89% | 0.96% | 1.08% | 1.30% | 1.56% | 1.04% | 1.30% | 1.69% | 1.97% | 1.58% | 1.79% | 1.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACWX and IWV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACWX has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to IWV (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWX dropped -60.40% vs IWV's -55.61%.
On 10-year performance, IWV leads with 14.98% vs 10.06% for ACWX. On fees, IWV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, IWV has been the lower-risk option at 4.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWV has performed better with a 14.98% return vs 10.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWX.
ACWX has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.89% for IWV.
ACWX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IWV is Large Cap Blend Equities. ACWX tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index, while IWV tracks Russell 3000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ACWX and 0.20% for IWV.
IWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACWX and IWV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer