IWF vs. IWY
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY).
IWF and IWY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. IWY is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell Top 200 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2009. Both IWF and IWY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IWF or IWY.
Correlation
The correlation between IWF and IWY is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IWF vs. IWY - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IWF:
1.96
IWY:
1.93
IWF:
2.56
IWY:
2.52
IWF:
1.35
IWY:
1.34
IWF:
2.61
IWY:
2.54
IWF:
9.94
IWY:
9.36
IWF:
3.49%
IWY:
3.76%
IWF:
17.67%
IWY:
18.23%
IWF:
-64.18%
IWY:
-32.68%
IWF:
-2.76%
IWY:
-3.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWF achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly higher than IWY's 0.79% return. Over the past 10 years, IWF has underperformed IWY with an annualized return of 16.85%, while IWY has yielded a comparatively higher 18.08% annualized return.
IWF
1.34%
0.99%
12.80%
31.00%
18.00%
16.85%
IWY
0.79%
0.61%
11.93%
31.37%
19.40%
18.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWF vs. IWY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWF has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IWY's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IWF vs. IWY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IWF
IWY
IWF vs. IWY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IWF vs. IWY - Dividend Comparison
IWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, more than IWY's 0.42% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.45% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.91% | 0.50% | 0.66% | 0.99% | 1.27% | 1.10% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 1.33% |
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 0.42% | 0.42% | 0.68% | 0.88% | 0.50% | 0.71% | 1.06% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.58% | 1.44% |
Drawdowns
IWF vs. IWY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWF drawdown since its inception was -64.18%, which is greater than IWY's maximum drawdown of -32.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWF and IWY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IWF vs. IWY - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) have volatilities of 6.34% and 6.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.