IWF vs. SPY
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY).
IWF and SPY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. SPY is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Jan 22, 1993. Both IWF and SPY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IWF or SPY.
Key characteristics
| IWF | SPY | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 22.76% | 20.59% |
| 1Y Return | 39.64% | 35.52% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 11.83% | 11.48% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 19.31% | 15.86% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 16.25% | 13.21% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.47 | 2.95 |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.83% | 12.38% |
| Max Drawdown | -64.18% | -55.19% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.00% | -1.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWF and SPY is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IWF vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IWF achieves a 22.76% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 20.59% return. Over the past 10 years, IWF has outperformed SPY with an annualized return of 16.25%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively lower 13.21% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWF vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWF has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IWF vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IWF vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
IWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than SPY's 1.23% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.54% | 0.67% | 0.91% | 0.49% | 0.66% | 0.99% | 1.27% | 1.10% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 1.32% | 1.29% |
SPY SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.23% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% | 1.87% | 1.81% |
Drawdowns
IWF vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWF drawdown since its inception was -64.18%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWF and SPY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IWF vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 3.28%. This indicates that IWF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.