PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACWX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACWX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWX achieves a 16.57% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.42%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.


ACWX

1D
0.36%
1M
4.21%
YTD
16.57%
6M
17.25%
1Y
35.16%
3Y*
20.31%
5Y*
9.20%
10Y*
10.42%

VOO

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.08%
YTD
9.75%
6M
9.30%
1Y
26.77%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
15.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
16.57%32.59%5.17%15.63%-16.07%7.67%10.29%21.05%-13.99%27.20%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.75%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWX and VOO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.82

The correlation between ACWX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

ACWX vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ACWX
VOO

Technology

23.8%
39.1%

Financial Services

23.7%
10.9%

Industrials

13.6%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
9.8%

Basic Materials

6.6%
1.7%

Healthcare

6.5%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
4.5%

Communication Services

4.6%
10.5%

Energy

4.4%
3.2%

Utilities

2.9%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.8%

Technology

ACWX
23.8%
VOO
39.1%

Financial Services

ACWX
23.7%
VOO
10.9%

Industrials

ACWX
13.6%
VOO
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ACWX
7.0%
VOO
9.8%

Basic Materials

ACWX
6.6%
VOO
1.7%

Healthcare

ACWX
6.5%
VOO
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

ACWX
5.0%
VOO
4.5%

Communication Services

ACWX
4.6%
VOO
10.5%

Energy

ACWX
4.4%
VOO
3.2%

Utilities

ACWX
2.9%
VOO
2.5%

Real Estate

ACWX
1.3%
VOO
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACWX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWX
ACWX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ACWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACWXVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.39

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

3.02

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.86

13.58

-1.72

ACWX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACWX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWX drawdown since its inception was -60.40%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACWXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.40%

-33.99%

-26.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.42%

-8.90%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.84%

-18.69%

+4.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.78%

-24.52%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.38%

-33.99%

-1.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.74%

+1.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.30%

-3.68%

-9.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

1.98%

+0.99%

Volatility

ACWX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) has a higher volatility of 6.55% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.60%. This indicates that ACWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACWXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.55%

4.60%

+1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.41%

9.73%

+4.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.45%

12.39%

+4.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.47%

16.90%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.41%

18.05%

-0.64%

ACWX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACWX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

ACWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than VOO's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
2.46%2.82%2.97%2.96%2.68%2.74%1.88%3.22%2.60%2.40%2.77%2.51%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.04%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACWX and VOO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACWX has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWX dropped -60.40% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.77% vs 10.42% for ACWX. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.77% return vs 10.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWX.

ACWX has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 1.04% for VOO.

ACWX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. ACWX tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ACWX and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACWX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer