PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
blend
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


BND 13.50%BNDX 13.50%VT 73.00%BondBondEquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in blend, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Jun 4, 2013, corresponding to the inception date of BNDX

Returns By Period

As of Apr 2, 2026, the blend returned -0.64% Year-To-Date and 9.14% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-3.43%-3.84%-1.98%16.08%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
blend
-0.15%-2.51%-0.64%1.28%16.40%13.33%6.96%9.14%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
0.22%-0.98%0.31%0.85%4.27%3.53%0.30%1.70%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
-0.23%-3.01%-0.97%1.52%21.33%16.97%9.38%11.66%
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
-0.10%-1.55%-0.08%0.10%2.63%3.79%0.18%1.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jun 5, 2013, blend's average daily return is +0.03%, while the average monthly return is +0.70%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 8.3 years.

Historically, 68% of months were positive and 32% were negative. The best month was Nov 2020 with a return of +9.2%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -11.1%. The longest winning streak lasted 15 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.

On a daily basis, blend closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 13, 2020 with a return of +6.0%, while the worst single day was Mar 12, 2020 at -8.2%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20262.37%1.62%-5.06%0.60%-0.64%
20252.34%0.10%-2.73%0.69%4.14%3.70%0.75%2.34%2.70%1.70%0.21%0.57%17.60%
2024-0.10%3.03%2.62%-3.13%3.61%1.36%2.05%1.97%1.95%-2.02%3.39%-2.48%12.61%
20236.35%-2.89%2.78%1.15%-1.02%4.21%2.69%-2.16%-3.69%-2.35%7.63%4.69%17.90%
2022-3.81%-2.34%0.67%-6.83%0.37%-6.33%5.84%-3.83%-7.94%4.56%6.92%-3.77%-16.49%
2021-0.37%1.52%1.94%3.11%1.18%1.05%0.81%1.56%-3.29%3.70%-1.77%2.65%12.55%

Benchmark Metrics

blend has an annualized alpha of 0.21%, beta of 0.68, and R² of 0.93 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since June 05, 2013.

  • This portfolio participated in 77.03% of S&P 500 Index downside but only 68.80% of its upside — more exposed to losses than it benefited from rallies.
  • Beta of 0.68 indicates this portfolio moves significantly less than S&P 500 Index — a genuinely defensive profile with reduced participation in both market rallies and downturns.

Alpha
0.21%
Beta
0.68
0.93
Upside Capture
68.80%
Downside Capture
77.03%

Expense Ratio

blend has an expense ratio of 0.06%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

blend ranks 59 for risk / return — on par with similar portfolios. You're getting a typical balance of risk and reward. Not a standout, but not a red flag either — a reasonable choice if other factors align with your goals.


blend Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
blend Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
blend Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
blend Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
blend Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
blend Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.30

0.88

+0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.90

1.37

+0.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.21

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

1.39

+0.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.39

6.43

+1.96


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
481.001.421.181.714.64
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
681.241.831.271.868.47
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
340.821.151.150.893.55

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

blend Sharpe ratios as of Apr 2, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.30
  • 5-Year: 0.58
  • 10-Year: 0.73
  • All Time: 0.68

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.01 to 1.70, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of blend compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

blend provided a 2.45% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio2.45%2.45%2.48%2.53%2.16%2.12%1.68%2.52%2.64%2.18%2.34%2.36%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.92%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.80%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
4.47%4.39%4.18%4.42%1.51%3.74%1.11%3.40%3.01%2.23%1.89%1.63%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the blend. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the blend was 25.70%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 94 trading sessions.

The current blend drawdown is 4.76%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-25.7%Feb 13, 202027Mar 23, 202094Aug 5, 2020121
-23.42%Nov 9, 2021235Oct 14, 2022339Feb 22, 2024574
-14.3%Jan 29, 2018229Dec 24, 2018121Jun 19, 2019350
-13.9%Apr 29, 2015200Feb 11, 2016124Aug 9, 2016324
-12.1%Feb 19, 202535Apr 8, 202527May 16, 202562

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 3 assets, with an effective number of assets of 1.76, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkBNDXBNDVTPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.01-0.020.950.94
BNDX0.011.000.720.020.10
BND-0.020.721.000.010.09
VT0.950.020.011.000.99
Portfolio0.940.100.090.991.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Jun 5, 2013