SMH vs. SCHD
SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMH returned 37.68%/yr vs 12.77%/yr for SCHD. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
SMH vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 77.13% return, which is significantly higher than SCHD's 19.01% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 37.68%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.77% annualized return.
SMH
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 25.87%
- YTD
- 77.13%
- 6M
- 75.61%
- 1Y
- 157.20%
- 3Y*
- 64.17%
- 5Y*
- 39.21%
- 10Y*
- 37.68%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 19.01%
- 6M
- 18.63%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
SMH vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 77.13% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.01% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMH and SCHD is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SMH and SCHD has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SMH vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMH
SCHD
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SMH
SCHD
Basic Materials
SMH
-
SCHD
Communication Services
SMH
-
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
SMH
-
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
SMH
-
SCHD
Energy
SMH
-
SCHD
Financial Services
SMH
-
SCHD
Healthcare
SMH
-
SCHD
Industrials
SMH
-
SCHD
Real Estate
SMH
-
SCHD
-
Utilities
SMH
-
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMH vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
SMH
SCHD
SMH vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMH | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | 1.45 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.59 | 5.91 | +4.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 40.63 | 14.53 | +26.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMH | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.19 | 2.49 | +2.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.13 | 0.58 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.16 | 0.77 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.86 | -0.52 |
Drawdowns
SMH vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMH | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.96% | -33.37% | -51.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.93% | -4.61% | -10.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.74% | -16.13% | -19.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.30% | -16.85% | -28.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.30% | -33.37% | -11.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.40% | +1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.09% | -3.32% | -37.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.89% | 1.88% | +2.01% |
Volatility
SMH vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 11.47% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.66%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMH | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.47% | 2.66% | +8.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.29% | 7.66% | +16.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.56% | 10.96% | +19.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.01% | 14.38% | +20.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.57% | 16.72% | +15.85% |
SMH vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMH vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMH and SCHD have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (11.47%) compared to SCHD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMH dropped -84.96% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.68% vs 12.77% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.68% return vs 12.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 0.17% for SMH.
SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while SCHD is Dividend. SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.06% for SCHD.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.19 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMH and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer