CHAT vs. SMH

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHAT is a Artificial Intelligence fund actively managed by Roundhill, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. CHAT is actively managed, while SMH is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CHAT returned 45.97%/yr vs 55.27%/yr for SMH. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CHAT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.

Performance

CHAT vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHAT achieves a 51.14% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 58.19% return.

CHAT

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: -2.08%
• 6M: 50.12%
• YTD: 51.14%
• 1Y: 78.97%
• 3Y*: 45.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 48.79%

SMH

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: -5.73%
• 6M: 49.13%
• YTD: 58.19%
• 1Y: 99.05%
• 3Y*: 55.27%
• 5Y*: 34.32%
• 10Y*: 34.58%
• ALL TIME*: 11.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	$67.53M	$57.41M	$65.64M
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	$8.47B	$7.04B	$7.03B

CHAT vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	51.14%	49.85%	30.98%	21.04%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	58.19%	49.17%	39.10%	35.85%

Correlation

The correlation between CHAT and SMH is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023	0.87

The correlation between CHAT and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

CHAT vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CHAT	SMH
Technology	78.9%	100.0%
Communication Services	15.2%	-
Industrials	3.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	2.3%	-
Financial Services	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CHAT vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 69
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 69

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 87
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 83
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CHAT vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHAT	SMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	2.57	-0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	2.93	-0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.39	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.80	4.05	-1.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.68	15.89	-6.20

CHAT vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHAT Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHAT and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CHAT vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHAT drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAT and SMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHAT	SMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.34%	-84.96%	+53.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.34%	-24.62%	-3.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.34%	-35.74%	+4.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.30%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.37%	-14.83%	+0.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.77%	-40.88%	+35.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.18%	6.26%	+1.92%

Volatility

CHAT vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a higher volatility of 16.97% compared to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 14.68%. This indicates that CHAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHAT	SMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.97%	14.68%	+2.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.87%	33.23%	+1.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.55%	38.76%	+0.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.58%	36.59%	-4.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.58%	33.37%	-0.79%

CHAT vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHAT vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than SMH's 0.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	1.89%	2.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.19%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHAT and SMH in my portfolio?

CHAT and SMH have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHAT or SMH?

CHAT has higher volatility (16.97%) compared to SMH (14.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHAT dropped -31.34% vs SMH's -84.96%.

Which ETF is better, CHAT or SMH?

On 3-year performance, SMH leads with 55.27% vs 45.97% for CHAT. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SMH has been the lower-risk option at 14.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CHAT or SMH?

Over the 3-year period, SMH has performed better with a 55.27% return vs 45.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHAT or SMH?

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CHAT or SMH?

CHAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.19% for SMH.

What is the main difference between CHAT and SMH?

CHAT is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while SMH is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CHAT and 0.35% for SMH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.