SCHD vs. SMH
SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHD returned 12.64%/yr vs 36.02%/yr for SMH. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHD charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
SCHD vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 18.75% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 58.19% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHD has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 12.64%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 36.02% annualized return.
SCHD
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- YTD
- 18.75%
- 6M
- 18.75%
- 1Y
- 27.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.14%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- 12.64%
SMH
- 1D
- -9.22%
- 1M
- 3.63%
- YTD
- 58.19%
- 6M
- 56.81%
- 1Y
- 127.40%
- 3Y*
- 58.39%
- 5Y*
- 36.10%
- 10Y*
- 36.02%
SCHD vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 18.75% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 58.19% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHD and SMH is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SCHD and SMH has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SCHD vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHD
SMH
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Consumer Defensive
SCHD
SMH
-
Healthcare
SCHD
SMH
-
Technology
SCHD
SMH
Energy
SCHD
SMH
-
Financial Services
SCHD
SMH
-
Industrials
SCHD
SMH
-
Communication Services
SCHD
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
SCHD
SMH
-
Basic Materials
SCHD
SMH
-
Utilities
SCHD
SMH
-
Real Estate
SCHD
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHD vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
SCHD
SMH
SCHD vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHD | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.59 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.07 | 8.58 | -2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.90 | 32.42 | -17.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHD | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | 4.00 | -1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 1.03 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 1.11 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.32 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
SCHD vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHD | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.37% | -84.96% | +51.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.61% | -14.93% | +10.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.13% | -35.74% | +19.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.85% | -45.30% | +28.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.37% | -45.30% | +11.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -10.69% | +9.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.32% | -41.08% | +37.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 3.94% | -2.06% |
Volatility
SCHD vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is 2.87%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 14.88%. This indicates that SCHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHD | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 14.88% | -12.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.61% | 26.35% | -18.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.98% | 32.03% | -21.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 35.24% | -20.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 32.70% | -15.98% |
SCHD vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHD vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than SMH's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.27% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.19% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHD and SMH have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (14.88%) compared to SCHD (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 36.02% vs 12.64% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 36.02% return vs 12.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 0.19% for SMH.
SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while SMH is Semiconductors. SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.00 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHD and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer