PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGOV vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGOV vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGOV achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.15% return.


SGOV

1D
0.02%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.61%
6M
1.78%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
4.71%
5Y*
3.56%
10Y*

SMH

1D
1.72%
1M
8.30%
YTD
72.15%
6M
75.62%
1Y
136.32%
3Y*
60.05%
5Y*
38.42%
10Y*
37.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGOV vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
1.61%4.24%5.27%5.12%1.58%0.04%0.04%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
72.15%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.68%

Correlation

The correlation between SGOV and SMH is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2020

-0.01

The correlation between SGOV and SMH shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.01 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGOV vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGOV
SGOV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGOV vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGOVSMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+16.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+271.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

195.55

1.60

+193.95

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

398.20

9.18

+389.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4,461.98

33.74

+4,428.24

SGOV vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGOV Sharpe Ratio is 20.28, which is higher than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 4.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGOV and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGOV vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGOV drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGOV and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGOVSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-84.96%

+84.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.01%

-14.93%

+14.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.01%

-35.74%

+35.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.03%

-45.30%

+45.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.81%

+2.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-41.04%

+41.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

4.06%

-4.06%

Volatility

SGOV vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) is 0.05%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 16.25%. This indicates that SGOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGOVSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.05%

16.25%

-16.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.13%

27.73%

-27.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20%

33.20%

-33.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.24%

35.47%

-35.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.24%

32.82%

-32.58%

SGOV vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGOV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGOV vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

SGOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
3.85%4.10%5.10%4.87%1.45%0.03%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.18%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGOV and SMH have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMH has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to SGOV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGOV dropped -0.03% vs SMH's -84.96%.

On 5-year performance, SMH leads with 38.42% vs 3.56% for SGOV. On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SMH has performed better with a 38.42% return vs 3.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.

SGOV has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.

SGOV is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while SMH is Semiconductors. SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SGOV and 0.35% for SMH.

SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.28 vs 4.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGOV and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer