PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHD vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHD vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 19.60% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 9.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHD having a 12.82% annualized return and DGRO not far ahead at 13.42%.


SCHD

1D
0.84%
1M
2.42%
YTD
19.60%
6M
18.52%
1Y
25.79%
3Y*
14.80%
5Y*
8.55%
10Y*
12.82%

DGRO

1D
0.87%
1M
2.74%
YTD
9.11%
6M
8.02%
1Y
22.19%
3Y*
16.70%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*
13.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHD vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.60%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
9.11%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHD and DGRO is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014

0.93

The correlation between SCHD and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHD vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHD
DGRO

Consumer Defensive

19.2%
11.5%

Healthcare

18.8%
16.4%

Technology

16.4%
19.4%

Energy

16.2%
5.6%

Financial Services

9.3%
21.2%

Industrials

7.5%
10.8%

Communication Services

6.3%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
5.7%

Basic Materials

1.2%
2.5%

Utilities

0.0%
6.9%

Real Estate

-

-

Consumer Defensive

SCHD
19.2%
DGRO
11.5%

Healthcare

SCHD
18.8%
DGRO
16.4%

Technology

SCHD
16.4%
DGRO
19.4%

Energy

SCHD
16.2%
DGRO
5.6%

Financial Services

SCHD
9.3%
DGRO
21.2%

Industrials

SCHD
7.5%
DGRO
10.8%

Communication Services

SCHD
6.3%
DGRO
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHD
6.3%
DGRO
5.7%

Basic Materials

SCHD
1.2%
DGRO
2.5%

Utilities

SCHD
0.0%
DGRO
6.9%

Real Estate

SCHD

-

DGRO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHD vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHD vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHDDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.42

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.61

3.45

+2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.71

13.27

+0.44

SCHD vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHD Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHD and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHD vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, roughly equal to the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHDDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.37%

-35.10%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.61%

-6.47%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.13%

-14.03%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.85%

-19.31%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

-35.10%

+1.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-0.49%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.32%

-3.44%

+0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

1.68%

+0.21%

Volatility

SCHD vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a higher volatility of 2.96% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.62%. This indicates that SCHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHDDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

2.62%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

7.03%

+0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.91%

9.57%

+1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

13.83%

+0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.72%

16.63%

+0.09%

SCHD vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHD vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than DGRO's 1.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.95%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.25%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHD and DGRO have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHD has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to DGRO (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.42% vs 12.82% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.42% return vs 12.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for DGRO.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 1.95% for DGRO.

SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.08% for DGRO.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHD and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer