AVUV vs. SMH
AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVUV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. AVUV is actively managed, while SMH is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AVUV returned 11.22%/yr vs 37.20%/yr for SMH. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVUV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
AVUV vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVUV achieves a 19.43% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 64.11% return.
AVUV
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- 19.43%
- 6M
- 18.83%
- 1Y
- 36.48%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 11.22%
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 4.32%
- YTD
- 64.11%
- 6M
- 60.66%
- 1Y
- 130.72%
- 3Y*
- 59.79%
- 5Y*
- 37.20%
- 10Y*
- 36.76%
AVUV vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 19.43% | 7.44% | 9.28% | 22.82% | -4.91% | 42.20% | 6.43% | 8.54% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 64.11% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 19.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVUV and SMH is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019 | 0.54 |
The correlation between AVUV and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
AVUV vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVUV
SMH
Financial Services
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
AVUV
SMH
-
Energy
AVUV
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
AVUV
SMH
-
Industrials
AVUV
SMH
-
Technology
AVUV
SMH
Basic Materials
AVUV
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
AVUV
SMH
-
Healthcare
AVUV
SMH
-
Communication Services
AVUV
SMH
-
Real Estate
AVUV
SMH
-
Utilities
AVUV
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVUV vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
AVUV
SMH
AVUV vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVUV | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.60 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.61 | 8.81 | -4.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.68 | 32.88 | -19.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVUV | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 4.06 | -1.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 1.06 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.33 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
AVUV vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVUV drawdown since its inception was -49.42%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUV and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVUV | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.42% | -84.96% | +35.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.95% | -14.93% | +6.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.79% | -35.74% | +6.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.79% | -45.30% | +16.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.35% | +7.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.93% | -41.06% | +33.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 3.99% | -1.32% |
Volatility
AVUV vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) is 4.29%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 14.85%. This indicates that AVUV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVUV | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.29% | 14.85% | -10.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.40% | 26.75% | -15.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.54% | 32.40% | -14.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.75% | 35.32% | -12.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.27% | 32.75% | -4.48% |
AVUV vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVUV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVUV vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
AVUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than SMH's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.65% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.21% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.19% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVUV and SMH have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (14.85%) compared to AVUV (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUV dropped -49.42% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 5-year performance, SMH leads with 37.20% vs 11.22% for AVUV. On fees, AVUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.20% return vs 11.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.
AVUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 0.19% for SMH.
AVUV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AVUV and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.06 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVUV and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer