ZIM vs. QQQ

Last updated Apr 4, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ).

QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999.

Performance

ZIM vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZIM achieves a 28.06% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's -4.65% return.

ZIM

• 1D: 1.35%
• 1M: -4.40%
• YTD: 28.06%
• 6M: 98.47%
• 1Y: 131.29%
• 3Y*: 37.98%
• 5Y*: 32.92%
• 10Y*: —

QQQ

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -3.81%
• YTD: -4.65%
• 6M: -2.77%
• 1Y: 39.07%
• 3Y*: 22.97%
• 5Y*: 13.18%
• 10Y*: 19.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZIM vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.	28.06%	28.11%	176.93%	-21.06%	-52.70%	463.11%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	-4.65%	20.77%	25.58%	54.86%	-32.58%	24.41%

Correlation

The correlation between ZIM and QQQ is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners. Combining low-correlation assets is one of the most reliable ways to reduce portfolio risk without sacrificing expected returns.

Return for Risk

ZIM vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZIM

ZIM Risk / Return Rank: 79
ZIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
ZIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
ZIM Omega Ratio Rank: 76
ZIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
ZIM Martin Ratio Rank: 78

QQQ

QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 58
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 59
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZIM vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZIM	QQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	1.04	+0.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	1.62	+0.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.23	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	1.93	+0.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.02	7.00	-0.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZIM vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZIM Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZIM and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZIM	QQQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.27	1.04	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.59	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	0.38	+0.43

Drawdowns

ZIM vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZIM drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIM and QQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZIM	QQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.68%	-82.97%	-1.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.64%	-11.96%	-20.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-84.68%	-35.12%	-49.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.12%	-7.75%	+0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.07%	-32.98%	-8.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.51%	3.48%	+11.03%

Volatility

ZIM vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) has a higher volatility of 8.53% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.38%. This indicates that ZIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZIM	QQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.53%	6.38%	+2.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.49%	12.82%	+27.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	63.02%	22.69%	+40.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.34%	22.37%	+44.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	68.47%	22.24%	+46.23%

Dividends

ZIM vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

ZIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, more than QQQ's 0.48% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.	7.57%	20.16%	22.40%	64.84%	160.27%	7.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	0.48%	0.45%	0.56%	0.62%	0.80%	0.43%	0.55%	0.74%	0.91%	0.84%	1.06%	0.99%