PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZIM vs. TRMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

ZIM vs. TRMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and TORM plc (TRMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZIM vs. TRMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
26.36%28.11%176.93%-21.06%-52.70%463.11%
TRMD
TORM plc
46.83%11.21%-23.37%31.64%297.66%6.85%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ZIM:

$3.13B

TRMD:

$2.79B

EPS

ZIM:

$3.98

TRMD:

$2.85

PE Ratio

ZIM:

6.53

TRMD:

9.82

PEG Ratio

ZIM:

0.04

TRMD:

0.10

PS Ratio

ZIM:

0.45

TRMD:

2.10

PB Ratio

ZIM:

0.78

TRMD:

1.27

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZIM:

$6.90B

TRMD:

$1.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZIM:

$1.16B

TRMD:

$582.69M

EBITDA (TTM)

ZIM:

$2.27B

TRMD:

$580.07M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZIM achieves a 26.36% return, which is significantly lower than TRMD's 46.83% return.


ZIM

1D
-1.52%
1M
-6.95%
YTD
26.36%
6M
98.68%
1Y
84.81%
3Y*
37.15%
5Y*
32.56%
10Y*

TRMD

1D
0.39%
1M
-7.08%
YTD
46.83%
6M
38.47%
1Y
87.27%
3Y*
12.60%
5Y*
41.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZIM vs. TRMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZIM
ZIM Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ZIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZIM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ZIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZIM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

TRMD
TRMD Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
TRMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRMD Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
TRMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRMD Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZIM vs. TRMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and TORM plc (TRMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZIMTRMDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.35

2.22

-0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.21

2.83

-0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.34

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

4.46

-1.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.61

11.70

-5.09

ZIM vs. TRMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZIM Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the TRMD Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZIM and TRMD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZIMTRMDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

2.22

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.90

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.48

+0.32

Correlation

The correlation between ZIM and TRMD is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ZIM vs. TRMD - Dividend Comparison

ZIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.67%, more than TRMD's 7.57% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
7.67%20.16%22.40%64.84%160.27%7.65%0.00%
TRMD
TORM plc
7.57%10.32%30.13%23.05%6.99%0.00%14.89%

Drawdowns

ZIM vs. TRMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZIM drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, which is greater than TRMD's maximum drawdown of -60.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIM and TRMD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ZIMTRMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.68%

-60.59%

-24.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.64%

-19.49%

-13.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.68%

-60.59%

-24.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.35%

-13.10%

+4.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.09%

-22.91%

-18.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.50%

7.43%

+7.07%

Volatility

ZIM vs. TRMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) is 9.13%, while TORM plc (TRMD) has a volatility of 15.01%. This indicates that ZIM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ZIMTRMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.13%

15.01%

-5.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.49%

26.37%

+14.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.26%

39.46%

+23.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.37%

45.88%

+21.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.50%

60.24%

+8.26%

Financials

ZIM vs. TRMD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. and TORM plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
1.48B
354.98M
(ZIM) Total Revenue
(TRMD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ZIM vs. TRMD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. and TORM plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
5.6%
38.0%
Portfolio components
ZIM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a gross profit of 83.60M and revenue of 1.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 5.6%.

TRMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TORM plc reported a gross profit of 134.80M and revenue of 354.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.0%.

ZIM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported an operating income of 3.20M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.2%.

TRMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TORM plc reported an operating income of 98.16M and revenue of 354.98M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.

ZIM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a net income of 38.10M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.

TRMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TORM plc reported a net income of 87.39M and revenue of 354.98M, resulting in a net margin of 24.6%.