PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZIM vs. TRMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ZIM vs. TRMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and TORM plc (TRMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZIM achieves a 23.05% return, which is significantly lower than TRMD's 62.37% return.


ZIM

1D
3.82%
1M
0.12%
YTD
23.05%
6M
31.40%
1Y
61.18%
3Y*
52.37%
5Y*
18.83%
10Y*

TRMD

1D
2.92%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
62.37%
6M
63.37%
1Y
76.03%
3Y*
25.45%
5Y*
46.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZIM vs. TRMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
23.05%28.11%176.93%-21.06%-52.70%463.11%
TRMD
TORM plc
62.37%11.21%-23.37%31.64%297.66%10.56%

Correlation

The correlation between ZIM and TRMD is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021

0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ZIM:

$3.04B

TRMD:

$3.13B

EPS

ZIM:

$0.81

TRMD:

$3.40

PE Ratio

ZIM:

31.10

TRMD:

8.90

PEG Ratio

ZIM:

0.18

TRMD:

0.09

PS Ratio

ZIM:

0.48

TRMD:

2.17

PB Ratio

ZIM:

0.80

TRMD:

1.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZIM:

$6.29B

TRMD:

$1.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZIM:

$676.00M

TRMD:

$575.03M

EBITDA (TTM)

ZIM:

$1.73B

TRMD:

$639.99M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZIM vs. TRMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZIM
ZIM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ZIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZIM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ZIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZIM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

TRMD
TRMD Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
TRMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRMD Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
TRMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRMD Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZIM vs. TRMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and TORM plc (TRMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZIMTRMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

3.81

-1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.18

9.56

-4.38

ZIM vs. TRMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZIM Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the TRMD Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZIM and TRMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZIM vs. TRMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZIM drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, which is greater than TRMD's maximum drawdown of -60.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIM and TRMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZIMTRMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.68%

-60.59%

-24.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.84%

-20.06%

-9.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.12%

-60.59%

+3.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.68%

-60.59%

-24.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.49%

-11.17%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.77%

-22.52%

-17.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.85%

8.18%

+3.67%

Volatility

ZIM vs. TRMD - Volatility Comparison

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) has a higher volatility of 11.94% compared to TORM plc (TRMD) at 11.21%. This indicates that ZIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZIMTRMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.94%

11.21%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.70%

28.29%

+8.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.54%

37.91%

+14.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.74%

46.06%

+19.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.49%

59.76%

+7.73%

Dividends

ZIM vs. TRMD - Dividend Comparison

ZIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, less than TRMD's 7.99% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
TRMD
TORM plc
7.99%10.32%30.13%23.05%6.99%0.00%14.89%
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
4.95%20.16%22.40%64.84%160.27%7.65%0.00%

Financials

ZIM vs. TRMD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. and TORM plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
1.40B
395.84M
(ZIM) Total Revenue
(TRMD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ZIM vs. TRMD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. and TORM plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
3.4%
39.9%
Portfolio components
ZIM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a gross profit of 46.80M and revenue of 1.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.4%.

TRMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TORM plc reported a gross profit of 157.74M and revenue of 395.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.9%.

ZIM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported an operating income of -39.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.8%.

TRMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TORM plc reported an operating income of 135.10M and revenue of 395.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.1%.

ZIM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a net income of -86.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in a net margin of -6.2%.

TRMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TORM plc reported a net income of 120.52M and revenue of 395.84M, resulting in a net margin of 30.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ZIM and TRMD have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZIM has higher volatility (11.94%) compared to TRMD (11.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZIM dropped -84.68% vs TRMD's -60.59%.

TRMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZIM and TRMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer