ZIM vs. TRMD

In the year-to-date period, ZIM achieves a -18.76% return, which is significantly lower than TRMD's -9.54% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and TORM plc (TRMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ZIM Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the TRMD Sharpe Ratio of -0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZIM and TRMD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ZIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 55.65%, more than TRMD's 34.45% yield.

The maximum ZIM drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, which is greater than TRMD's maximum drawdown of -59.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIM and TRMD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) has a higher volatility of 31.91% compared to TORM plc (TRMD) at 17.54%. This indicates that ZIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. and TORM plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.