PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQ vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQ vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 20.71% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 9.78% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed VUG with an annualized return of 21.84%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively lower 18.25% annualized return.


QQQ

1D
-0.48%
1M
8.66%
YTD
20.71%
6M
19.19%
1Y
40.74%
3Y*
28.54%
5Y*
17.86%
10Y*
21.84%

VUG

1D
0.26%
1M
5.75%
YTD
9.78%
6M
8.99%
1Y
27.72%
3Y*
26.10%
5Y*
15.17%
10Y*
18.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQ vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
20.71%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
9.78%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ and VUG is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.95

The correlation between QQQ and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQ vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQ
VUG

Technology

53.8%
53.5%

Communication Services

15.8%
17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
1.5%

Healthcare

4.2%
4.6%

Industrials

2.8%
3.6%

Utilities

1.4%
0.9%

Basic Materials

1.1%
0.6%

Energy

0.6%
0.4%

Financial Services

0.2%
4.3%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.0%

Technology

QQQ
53.8%
VUG
53.5%

Communication Services

QQQ
15.8%
VUG
17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQ
12.3%
VUG
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

QQQ
7.7%
VUG
1.5%

Healthcare

QQQ
4.2%
VUG
4.6%

Industrials

QQQ
2.8%
VUG
3.6%

Utilities

QQQ
1.4%
VUG
0.9%

Basic Materials

QQQ
1.1%
VUG
0.6%

Energy

QQQ
0.6%
VUG
0.4%

Financial Services

QQQ
0.2%
VUG
4.3%

Real Estate

QQQ
0.1%
VUG
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQ vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQ vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.31

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

1.68

+1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.14

5.90

+7.25

QQQ vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is higher than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

1.76

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.69

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

0.85

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.62

-0.21

Drawdowns

QQQ vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.97%

-50.68%

-32.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-16.53%

+4.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.77%

-22.85%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

-35.61%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

-35.61%

+0.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-1.25%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.78%

-7.09%

-25.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

4.71%

-1.60%

Volatility

QQQ vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 3.81%. This indicates that QQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.51%

3.81%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.10%

12.11%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.94%

15.83%

+0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.37%

22.21%

+0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.29%

21.44%

+0.85%

QQQ vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QQQ vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.37%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, QQQ and VUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QQQ has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to VUG (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs VUG's -50.68%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.84% vs 18.25% for VUG. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.84% return vs 18.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ and VUG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.38%.

QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.03% for VUG.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQ and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer