ZIM vs. DAC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and Danaos Corporation (DAC).

Performance

ZIM vs. DAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and Danaos Corporation (DAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ZIM vs. DAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.	28.30%	28.11%	176.93%	-21.06%	-52.70%	463.11%
DAC Danaos Corporation	20.59%	22.24%	12.41%	47.51%	-26.57%	206.84%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ZIM : $3.18B DAC : $2.07B
EPS ZIM : $3.98 DAC : $26.91
PE Ratio ZIM : 6.63 DAC : 4.19
PS Ratio ZIM : 0.46 DAC : 1.99
PB Ratio ZIM : 0.79 DAC : 0.55
Total Revenue (TTM) ZIM : $6.90B DAC : $1.04B
Gross Profit (TTM) ZIM : $1.16B DAC : $626.24M
EBITDA (TTM) ZIM : $2.27B DAC : $736.66M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZIM achieves a 28.30% return, which is significantly higher than DAC's 20.59% return.

ZIM

• 1D: 1.82%
• 1M: -5.52%
• YTD: 28.30%
• 6M: 104.13%
• 1Y: 98.85%
• 3Y*: 37.85%
• 5Y*: 32.97%
• 10Y*: —

DAC

• 1D: 2.60%
• 1M: -4.50%
• YTD: 20.59%
• 6M: 27.64%
• 1Y: 49.75%
• 3Y*: 32.51%
• 5Y*: 21.86%
• 10Y*: 10.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ZIM vs. DAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZIM

ZIM Risk / Return Rank: 84
ZIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
ZIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
ZIM Omega Ratio Rank: 83
ZIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
ZIM Martin Ratio Rank: 81

DAC

DAC Risk / Return Rank: 88
DAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
DAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
DAC Omega Ratio Rank: 86
DAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
DAC Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZIM vs. DAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and Danaos Corporation (DAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZIM	DAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.86	-0.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	2.57	-0.15
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.34	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	2.88	-0.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.03	10.63	-4.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZIM vs. DAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZIM Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the DAC Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZIM and DAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZIM	DAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	1.86	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.60	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	-0.05	+0.85

Correlation

The correlation between ZIM and DAC is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ZIM vs. DAC - Dividend Comparison

ZIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.55%, more than DAC's 3.11% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.	7.55%	20.16%	22.40%	64.84%	160.27%	7.65%
DAC Danaos Corporation	3.11%	3.66%	4.06%	4.12%	5.70%	2.01%

Drawdowns

ZIM vs. DAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZIM drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, smaller than the maximum DAC drawdown of -99.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIM and DAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZIM	DAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.68%	-99.42%	+14.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.64%	-16.45%	-16.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-84.68%	-50.14%	-34.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-95.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.94%	-71.34%	+64.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.12%	-80.58%	+39.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.49%	4.45%	+10.04%

Volatility

ZIM vs. DAC - Volatility Comparison

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and Danaos Corporation (DAC) have volatilities of 9.55% and 9.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZIM	DAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.55%	9.33%	+0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.45%	15.40%	+25.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	63.53%	26.95%	+36.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.47%	36.45%	+31.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	68.52%	65.54%	+2.98%

Financials

ZIM vs. DAC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. and Danaos Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ZIM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a gross profit of 83.60M and revenue of 1.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 5.6%.

DAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Danaos Corporation reported a gross profit of 172.70M and revenue of 266.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.9%.

ZIM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported an operating income of 3.20M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.2%.

DAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Danaos Corporation reported an operating income of 122.93M and revenue of 266.26M, resulting in an operating margin of 46.2%.

ZIM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a net income of 38.10M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.

DAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Danaos Corporation reported a net income of 117.91M and revenue of 266.26M, resulting in a net margin of 44.3%.