ZIM vs. SBLK
Compare and contrast key facts about ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ZIM or SBLK.
Performance
ZIM vs. SBLK - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZIM achieves a 188.22% return, which is significantly higher than SBLK's 2.02% return.
ZIM
188.22%
17.10%
55.88%
305.24%
N/A
N/A
SBLK
2.02%
-1.81%
-18.96%
14.95%
25.81%
-1.94%
Fundamentals
| ZIM | SBLK | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.87B | $2.32B |
| EPS | -$16.30 | $2.64 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $5.43B | $969.21M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $1.27B | $360.44M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $1.15B | $246.28M |
Key characteristics
| ZIM | SBLK | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.33 | 0.52 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.15 | 0.93 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.42 | 1.11 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.23 | 0.16 |
| Martin Ratio | 15.21 | 1.31 |
| Ulcer Index | 17.97% | 11.69% |
| Daily Std Dev | 82.18% | 29.42% |
| Max Drawdown | -84.68% | -99.74% |
| Current Drawdown | -33.86% | -95.15% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between ZIM and SBLK is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ZIM vs. SBLK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ZIM vs. SBLK - Dividend Comparison
ZIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, less than SBLK's 10.58% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 4.33% | 64.84% | 160.27% | 7.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SBLK Star Bulk Carriers Corp. | 10.58% | 7.38% | 33.80% | 9.93% | 0.57% | 0.42% |
Drawdowns
ZIM vs. SBLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIM drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, smaller than the maximum SBLK drawdown of -99.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIM and SBLK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ZIM vs. SBLK - Volatility Comparison
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) has a higher volatility of 16.53% compared to Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) at 7.37%. This indicates that ZIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ZIM vs. SBLK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. and Star Bulk Carriers Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities