ZIM vs. SBLK
Compare and contrast key facts about ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK).
Performance
ZIM vs. SBLK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZIM vs. SBLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 26.36% | 28.11% | 176.93% | -21.06% | -52.70% | 463.11% |
SBLK Star Bulk Carriers Corp. | 25.00% | 30.76% | -21.04% | 19.24% | 8.50% | 146.85% |
Fundamentals
ZIM:
$3.13B
SBLK:
$2.70B
ZIM:
$3.98
SBLK:
$0.73
ZIM:
6.53
SBLK:
32.25
ZIM:
0.45
SBLK:
2.60
ZIM:
0.78
SBLK:
1.10
ZIM:
$6.90B
SBLK:
$1.04B
ZIM:
$1.16B
SBLK:
$344.33M
ZIM:
$2.27B
SBLK:
$318.33M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZIM achieves a 26.36% return, which is significantly higher than SBLK's 25.00% return.
ZIM
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- -6.95%
- YTD
- 26.36%
- 6M
- 98.68%
- 1Y
- 84.81%
- 3Y*
- 37.15%
- 5Y*
- 32.56%
- 10Y*
- —
SBLK
- 1D
- 2.96%
- 1M
- -10.65%
- YTD
- 25.00%
- 6M
- 29.03%
- 1Y
- 54.54%
- 3Y*
- 10.98%
- 5Y*
- 23.74%
- 10Y*
- 27.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZIM vs. SBLK — Risk / Return Rank
ZIM
SBLK
ZIM vs. SBLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZIM | SBLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.35 | 1.57 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.21 | 2.04 | +0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.28 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 2.88 | +0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.61 | 8.24 | -1.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZIM | SBLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 1.57 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.53 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | -0.20 | +0.99 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZIM and SBLK is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ZIM vs. SBLK - Dividend Comparison
ZIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.67%, more than SBLK's 2.45% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 7.67% | 20.16% | 22.40% | 64.84% | 160.27% | 7.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SBLK Star Bulk Carriers Corp. | 2.45% | 1.56% | 16.72% | 7.38% | 33.80% | 9.93% | 0.57% | 0.42% |
Drawdowns
ZIM vs. SBLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIM drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, smaller than the maximum SBLK drawdown of -99.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIM and SBLK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZIM | SBLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.68% | -99.76% | +15.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.64% | -19.11% | -13.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.68% | -48.44% | -36.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.35% | -94.36% | +86.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.09% | -82.59% | +41.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.50% | 6.81% | +7.69% |
Volatility
ZIM vs. SBLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) is 9.13%, while Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) has a volatility of 11.72%. This indicates that ZIM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZIM | SBLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.13% | 11.72% | -2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.49% | 22.65% | +17.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.26% | 34.90% | +28.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.37% | 45.05% | +22.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.50% | 53.71% | +14.79% |
Financials
ZIM vs. SBLK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. and Star Bulk Carriers Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ZIM vs. SBLK - Profitability Comparison
ZIM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a gross profit of 83.60M and revenue of 1.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 5.6%.
SBLK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported a gross profit of 104.73M and revenue of 300.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
ZIM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported an operating income of 3.20M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.2%.
SBLK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported an operating income of 81.66M and revenue of 300.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.2%.
ZIM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a net income of 38.10M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.
SBLK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported a net income of 65.15M and revenue of 300.59M, resulting in a net margin of 21.7%.