PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ZIM vs. SBLK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ZIM and SBLK is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

ZIM vs. SBLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
11.83%
-34.04%
ZIM
SBLK

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ZIM:

0.65

SBLK:

-0.78

Sortino Ratio

ZIM:

1.35

SBLK:

-1.02

Omega Ratio

ZIM:

1.17

SBLK:

0.89

Calmar Ratio

ZIM:

0.65

SBLK:

-0.24

Martin Ratio

ZIM:

2.70

SBLK:

-1.22

Ulcer Index

ZIM:

18.75%

SBLK:

18.63%

Daily Std Dev

ZIM:

77.42%

SBLK:

29.09%

Max Drawdown

ZIM:

-84.68%

SBLK:

-99.74%

Current Drawdown

ZIM:

-51.93%

SBLK:

-96.19%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ZIM:

$2.00B

SBLK:

$1.73B

EPS

ZIM:

$11.68

SBLK:

$2.93

PE Ratio

ZIM:

1.39

SBLK:

5.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZIM:

$6.63B

SBLK:

$956.54M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZIM:

$2.35B

SBLK:

$355.08M

EBITDA (TTM)

ZIM:

$3.03B

SBLK:

$428.88M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZIM achieves a -24.36% return, which is significantly lower than SBLK's -1.81% return.


ZIM

YTD

-24.36%

1M

-11.21%

6M

11.83%

1Y

57.34%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

SBLK

YTD

-1.81%

1M

-0.81%

6M

-34.04%

1Y

-21.84%

5Y*

22.84%

10Y*

2.44%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ZIM vs. SBLK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZIM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ZIM is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ZIM is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ZIM is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ZIM is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ZIM is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ZIM is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SBLK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SBLK is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SBLK is 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SBLK is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SBLK is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SBLK is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SBLK is 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ZIM vs. SBLK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ZIM, currently valued at 0.65, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.65-0.78
The chart of Sortino ratio for ZIM, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.35-1.02
The chart of Omega ratio for ZIM, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.170.89
The chart of Calmar ratio for ZIM, currently valued at 0.65, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.65-0.56
The chart of Martin ratio for ZIM, currently valued at 2.70, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.70-1.22
ZIM
SBLK

The current ZIM Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is higher than the SBLK Sharpe Ratio of -0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZIM and SBLK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.65
-0.78
ZIM
SBLK

Dividends

ZIM vs. SBLK - Dividend Comparison

ZIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.62%, more than SBLK's 17.03% yield.


TTM202420232022202120202019
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
29.62%22.40%64.84%160.27%7.65%0.00%0.00%
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
17.03%16.72%7.38%33.80%13.01%0.57%0.42%

Drawdowns

ZIM vs. SBLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZIM drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, smaller than the maximum SBLK drawdown of -99.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIM and SBLK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-51.93%
-40.56%
ZIM
SBLK

Volatility

ZIM vs. SBLK - Volatility Comparison

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) has a higher volatility of 20.43% compared to Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) at 8.41%. This indicates that ZIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
20.43%
8.41%
ZIM
SBLK

Financials

ZIM vs. SBLK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. and Star Bulk Carriers Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab