ZIM vs. GSL
Compare and contrast key facts about ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL).
Performance
ZIM vs. GSL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZIM vs. GSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 28.30% | 28.11% | 176.93% | -21.06% | -52.70% | 463.11% |
GSL Global Ship Lease, Inc. | 7.96% | 73.47% | 18.09% | 28.97% | -22.16% | 102.74% |
Fundamentals
ZIM:
$3.18B
GSL:
$1.34B
ZIM:
$3.98
GSL:
$11.65
ZIM:
6.63
GSL:
3.20
ZIM:
0.04
GSL:
0.12
ZIM:
0.46
GSL:
1.75
ZIM:
0.79
GSL:
0.74
ZIM:
$6.90B
GSL:
$759.92M
ZIM:
$1.16B
GSL:
$404.40M
ZIM:
$2.27B
GSL:
$557.27M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZIM achieves a 28.30% return, which is significantly higher than GSL's 7.96% return.
ZIM
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- -5.52%
- YTD
- 28.30%
- 6M
- 104.13%
- 1Y
- 98.85%
- 3Y*
- 37.85%
- 5Y*
- 32.97%
- 10Y*
- —
GSL
- 1D
- 3.53%
- 1M
- -9.37%
- YTD
- 7.96%
- 6M
- 25.54%
- 1Y
- 75.36%
- 3Y*
- 35.46%
- 5Y*
- 29.08%
- 10Y*
- 19.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZIM vs. GSL — Risk / Return Rank
ZIM
GSL
ZIM vs. GSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZIM | GSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.57 | 2.39 | -0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.42 | 2.90 | -0.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.41 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 3.48 | -0.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.03 | 11.97 | -5.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZIM | GSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 2.39 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.77 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.01 | +0.80 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZIM and GSL is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ZIM vs. GSL - Dividend Comparison
ZIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.55%, more than GSL's 6.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 7.55% | 20.16% | 22.40% | 64.84% | 160.27% | 7.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GSL Global Ship Lease, Inc. | 6.18% | 6.06% | 7.56% | 7.57% | 8.26% | 3.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.69% |
Drawdowns
ZIM vs. GSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIM drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, smaller than the maximum GSL drawdown of -95.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIM and GSL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZIM | GSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.68% | -95.26% | +10.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.64% | -21.17% | -11.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.68% | -47.50% | -37.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.94% | -9.42% | +2.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.12% | -59.33% | +18.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.49% | 6.15% | +8.34% |
Volatility
ZIM vs. GSL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) is 9.55%, while Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) has a volatility of 10.20%. This indicates that ZIM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZIM | GSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.55% | 10.20% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.45% | 20.90% | +19.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.53% | 31.66% | +31.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.47% | 38.07% | +29.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.52% | 56.07% | +12.45% |
Financials
ZIM vs. GSL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. and Global Ship Lease, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ZIM vs. GSL - Profitability Comparison
ZIM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a gross profit of 83.60M and revenue of 1.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 5.6%.
GSL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Global Ship Lease, Inc. reported a gross profit of 97.38M and revenue of 190.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.0%.
ZIM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported an operating income of 3.20M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.2%.
GSL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Global Ship Lease, Inc. reported an operating income of 87.72M and revenue of 190.95M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.9%.
ZIM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a net income of 38.10M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.
GSL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Global Ship Lease, Inc. reported a net income of 102.61M and revenue of 190.95M, resulting in a net margin of 53.7%.