PortfoliosLab logo
ZIM vs. GSL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ZIM and GSL is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ZIM vs. GSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ZIM:

0.63

GSL:

0.21

Sortino Ratio

ZIM:

1.31

GSL:

0.65

Omega Ratio

ZIM:

1.17

GSL:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

ZIM:

0.80

GSL:

0.18

Martin Ratio

ZIM:

2.61

GSL:

0.51

Ulcer Index

ZIM:

18.36%

GSL:

19.32%

Daily Std Dev

ZIM:

78.32%

GSL:

33.03%

Max Drawdown

ZIM:

-84.68%

GSL:

-94.83%

Current Drawdown

ZIM:

-35.09%

GSL:

-37.39%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ZIM:

$2.20B

GSL:

$877.85M

EPS

ZIM:

$19.04

GSL:

$9.77

PE Ratio

ZIM:

0.96

GSL:

2.52

PS Ratio

ZIM:

0.26

GSL:

1.24

PB Ratio

ZIM:

0.55

GSL:

0.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZIM:

$6.87B

GSL:

$528.97M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZIM:

$2.56B

GSL:

$291.56M

EBITDA (TTM)

ZIM:

$3.33B

GSL:

$370.69M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZIM achieves a 2.15% return, which is significantly lower than GSL's 15.67% return.


ZIM

YTD

2.15%

1M

30.27%

6M

3.69%

1Y

49.31%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

GSL

YTD

15.67%

1M

21.74%

6M

8.14%

1Y

6.89%

5Y*

51.65%

10Y*

-1.95%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ZIM vs. GSL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZIM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ZIM is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ZIM is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ZIM is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ZIM is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ZIM is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ZIM is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

GSL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GSL is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GSL is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GSL is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GSL is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GSL is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GSL is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ZIM vs. GSL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ZIM Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is higher than the GSL Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZIM and GSL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

ZIM vs. GSL - Dividend Comparison

ZIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.26%, more than GSL's 6.97% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
44.26%22.40%64.84%160.27%7.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GSL
Global Ship Lease, Inc.
6.97%7.56%7.57%8.26%3.27%0.00%6.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%10.80%

Drawdowns

ZIM vs. GSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZIM drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, smaller than the maximum GSL drawdown of -94.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIM and GSL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ZIM vs. GSL - Volatility Comparison

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) has a higher volatility of 22.50% compared to Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) at 8.90%. This indicates that ZIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ZIM vs. GSL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. and Global Ship Lease, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00BAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
2.17B
181.43M
(ZIM) Total Revenue
(GSL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ZIM vs. GSL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. and Global Ship Lease, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
33.7%
54.6%
(ZIM) Gross Margin
(GSL) Gross Margin
ZIM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a gross profit of 731.00M and revenue of 2.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.7%.

GSL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Global Ship Lease, Inc. reported a gross profit of 99.10M and revenue of 181.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.6%.

ZIM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported an operating income of 657.60M and revenue of 2.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.3%.

GSL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Global Ship Lease, Inc. reported an operating income of 96.01M and revenue of 181.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 52.9%.

ZIM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a net income of 561.50M and revenue of 2.17B, resulting in a net margin of 25.9%.

GSL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Global Ship Lease, Inc. reported a net income of 92.56M and revenue of 181.43M, resulting in a net margin of 51.0%.