PortfoliosLab logo
ZIM vs. MATX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ZIM and MATX is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

ZIM vs. MATX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and Matson, Inc. (MATX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ZIM:

0.63

MATX:

0.05

Sortino Ratio

ZIM:

1.31

MATX:

0.36

Omega Ratio

ZIM:

1.17

MATX:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

ZIM:

0.80

MATX:

0.03

Martin Ratio

ZIM:

2.61

MATX:

0.07

Ulcer Index

ZIM:

18.36%

MATX:

16.60%

Daily Std Dev

ZIM:

78.32%

MATX:

44.10%

Max Drawdown

ZIM:

-84.68%

MATX:

-70.57%

Current Drawdown

ZIM:

-35.09%

MATX:

-30.19%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ZIM:

$2.20B

MATX:

$3.79B

EPS

ZIM:

$19.04

MATX:

$15.07

PE Ratio

ZIM:

0.96

MATX:

7.71

PS Ratio

ZIM:

0.26

MATX:

1.09

PB Ratio

ZIM:

0.55

MATX:

1.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZIM:

$6.87B

MATX:

$3.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZIM:

$2.56B

MATX:

$1.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

ZIM:

$3.33B

MATX:

$871.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZIM achieves a 2.15% return, which is significantly higher than MATX's -13.35% return.


ZIM

YTD

2.15%

1M

30.27%

6M

3.69%

1Y

49.31%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

MATX

YTD

-13.35%

1M

15.84%

6M

-28.99%

1Y

2.14%

5Y*

38.17%

10Y*

12.46%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ZIM vs. MATX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZIM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ZIM is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ZIM is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ZIM is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ZIM is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ZIM is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ZIM is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

MATX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MATX is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MATX is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MATX is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MATX is 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MATX is 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MATX is 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ZIM vs. MATX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and Matson, Inc. (MATX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ZIM Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is higher than the MATX Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZIM and MATX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

ZIM vs. MATX - Dividend Comparison

ZIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.26%, more than MATX's 1.17% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
44.26%22.40%64.84%160.27%7.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MATX
Matson, Inc.
1.17%0.98%1.15%1.95%1.18%1.58%2.11%2.56%2.61%2.09%1.64%1.91%

Drawdowns

ZIM vs. MATX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZIM drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, which is greater than MATX's maximum drawdown of -70.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIM and MATX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ZIM vs. MATX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) is 22.50%, while Matson, Inc. (MATX) has a volatility of 27.14%. This indicates that ZIM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MATX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ZIM vs. MATX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. and Matson, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B4.00B20212022202320242025
2.17B
782.00M
(ZIM) Total Revenue
(MATX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ZIM vs. MATX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. and Matson, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
33.7%
100.0%
(ZIM) Gross Margin
(MATX) Gross Margin
ZIM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a gross profit of 731.00M and revenue of 2.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.7%.

MATX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Matson, Inc. reported a gross profit of 782.00M and revenue of 782.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

ZIM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported an operating income of 657.60M and revenue of 2.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.3%.

MATX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Matson, Inc. reported an operating income of 82.10M and revenue of 782.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%.

ZIM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a net income of 561.50M and revenue of 2.17B, resulting in a net margin of 25.9%.

MATX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Matson, Inc. reported a net income of 72.30M and revenue of 782.00M, resulting in a net margin of 9.3%.