PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZIM vs. IEP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ZIM vs. IEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and Icahn Enterprises L.P. (IEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZIM achieves a 23.05% return, which is significantly higher than IEP's 8.54% return.


ZIM

1D
3.82%
1M
0.12%
YTD
23.05%
6M
31.40%
1Y
61.18%
3Y*
52.37%
5Y*
18.83%
10Y*

IEP

1D
-0.96%
1M
-4.37%
YTD
8.54%
6M
11.19%
1Y
10.33%
3Y*
-20.40%
5Y*
-19.53%
10Y*
-4.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZIM vs. IEP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
23.05%28.11%176.93%-21.06%-52.70%463.11%
IEP
Icahn Enterprises L.P.
8.54%8.23%-37.79%-58.78%18.76%2.51%

Correlation

The correlation between ZIM and IEP is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021

0.17

Fundamentals

EPS

ZIM:

$0.81

IEP:

-$1.15

PS Ratio

ZIM:

0.48

IEP:

0.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZIM:

$6.29B

IEP:

$10.18B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZIM:

$676.00M

IEP:

$1.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

ZIM:

$1.73B

IEP:

$1.17B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZIM vs. IEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZIM
ZIM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ZIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZIM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ZIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZIM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

IEP
IEP Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEP Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
IEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEP Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZIM vs. IEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and Icahn Enterprises L.P. (IEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZIMIEPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.10

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

0.65

+1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.18

1.37

+3.81

ZIM vs. IEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZIM Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the IEP Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZIM and IEP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZIM vs. IEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZIM drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, roughly equal to the maximum IEP drawdown of -84.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIM and IEP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZIMIEPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.68%

-84.21%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.84%

-16.06%

-13.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.12%

-67.83%

+10.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.68%

-77.56%

-7.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.49%

-72.18%

+60.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.77%

-30.62%

-9.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.85%

7.56%

+4.29%

Volatility

ZIM vs. IEP - Volatility Comparison

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) has a higher volatility of 11.94% compared to Icahn Enterprises L.P. (IEP) at 4.81%. This indicates that ZIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZIMIEPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.94%

4.81%

+7.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.70%

16.07%

+20.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.54%

25.12%

+27.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.74%

41.02%

+24.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.49%

36.36%

+31.13%

Dividends

ZIM vs. IEP - Dividend Comparison

ZIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, less than IEP's 27.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEP
Icahn Enterprises L.P.
27.70%26.49%40.37%34.90%15.79%16.13%15.79%13.01%12.26%11.32%10.01%9.79%
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
4.95%20.16%22.40%64.84%160.27%7.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ZIM vs. IEP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. and Icahn Enterprises L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B4.00B4.50B20222023202420252026
1.40B
2.31B
(ZIM) Total Revenue
(IEP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ZIM vs. IEP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. and Icahn Enterprises L.P. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
3.4%
0
Portfolio components
ZIM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a gross profit of 46.80M and revenue of 1.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.4%.

IEP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Icahn Enterprises L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ZIM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported an operating income of -39.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.8%.

IEP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Icahn Enterprises L.P. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

ZIM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a net income of -86.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in a net margin of -6.2%.

IEP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Icahn Enterprises L.P. reported a net income of -612.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in a net margin of -26.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ZIM and IEP have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZIM has higher volatility (11.94%) compared to IEP (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZIM dropped -84.68% vs IEP's -84.21%.

ZIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZIM and IEP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer