ZIM vs. BIL
ZIM (ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.) is a stock, while BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Over the past 5 years, ZIM returned 21.09%/yr vs 3.54%/yr for BIL. Their -0.03 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past.
Performance
ZIM vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZIM achieves a 29.42% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 2.11% return.
ZIM
- 1D
- -2.60%
- 1M
- 12.10%
- 6M
- 27.62%
- YTD
- 29.42%
- 1Y
- 76.14%
- 3Y*
- 44.44%
- 5Y*
- 21.09%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 50.83%
BIL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- 3.78%
- 3Y*
- 4.54%
- 5Y*
- 3.54%
- 10Y*
- 2.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.37%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.00B | $883.07M | $928.53M | |
| $31.98M | $26.80M | $28.10M |
ZIM vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 29.42% | 28.11% | 176.93% | -21.06% | -52.70% | 463.11% |
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 2.11% | 4.15% | 5.19% | 4.94% | 1.40% | -0.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZIM and BIL is -0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZIM vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank
ZIM
BIL
ZIM vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZIM | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -17.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -149.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 68.82 | -67.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 346.53 | -343.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.08 | 2,457.45 | -2,451.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZIM vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIM drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIM and BIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZIM | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.68% | -0.78% | -83.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.84% | -0.01% | -29.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.61% | -0.01% | -54.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.68% | -0.08% | -84.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.90% | 0.00% | -6.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.16% | -0.26% | -38.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.56% | 0.00% | +12.56% |
Volatility
ZIM vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) has a higher volatility of 9.84% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that ZIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZIM | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.84% | 0.05% | +9.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.32% | 0.14% | +34.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.37% | 0.20% | +52.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.14% | 0.26% | +64.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.96% | 0.26% | +66.70% |
Dividends
ZIM vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
ZIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than BIL's 3.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.77% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% |
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 4.70% | 20.16% | 22.40% | 64.84% | 160.27% | 7.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZIM and BIL have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZIM has higher volatility (9.84%) compared to BIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZIM dropped -84.68% vs BIL's -0.78%.
BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.17 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZIM and BIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer