PortfoliosLab logo
BIL vs. SHV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BIL and SHV is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

BIL vs. SHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) and iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BIL:

20.66

SHV:

20.68

Sortino Ratio

BIL:

248.33

SHV:

280.04

Omega Ratio

BIL:

142.08

SHV:

131.78

Calmar Ratio

BIL:

438.29

SHV:

535.46

Martin Ratio

BIL:

4,035.58

SHV:

4,551.82

Ulcer Index

BIL:

0.00%

SHV:

0.00%

Daily Std Dev

BIL:

0.23%

SHV:

0.23%

Max Drawdown

BIL:

-0.77%

SHV:

-0.46%

Current Drawdown

BIL:

0.00%

SHV:

0.00%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BIL having a 1.56% return and SHV slightly lower at 1.54%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BIL having a 1.78% annualized return and SHV not far ahead at 1.84%.


BIL

YTD

1.56%

1M

0.31%

6M

2.14%

1Y

4.74%

5Y*

2.59%

10Y*

1.78%

SHV

YTD

1.54%

1M

0.28%

6M

2.14%

1Y

4.78%

5Y*

2.49%

10Y*

1.84%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BIL vs. SHV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIL has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than SHV's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BIL vs. SHV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BIL is 100100
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BIL is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BIL is 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BIL is 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BIL is 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BIL is 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

SHV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SHV is 100100
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SHV is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SHV is 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SHV is 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SHV is 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SHV is 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BIL vs. SHV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) and iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BIL Sharpe Ratio is 20.66, which is comparable to the SHV Sharpe Ratio of 20.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIL and SHV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

BIL vs. SHV - Dividend Comparison

BIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, which matches SHV's 4.70% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BIL
SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
4.68%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%0.00%0.00%
SHV
iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF
4.70%5.02%4.73%1.39%0.00%0.74%2.19%1.66%0.72%0.34%0.03%0.00%

Drawdowns

BIL vs. SHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIL drawdown since its inception was -0.77%, which is greater than SHV's maximum drawdown of -0.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIL and SHV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BIL vs. SHV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) has a higher volatility of 0.07% compared to iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) at 0.06%. This indicates that BIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...