PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIL vs. SGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIL vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BIL having a 1.69% return and SGOV slightly higher at 1.72%.


BIL

1D
0.01%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.69%
6M
1.74%
1Y
3.85%
3Y*
4.61%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
2.20%

SGOV

1D
0.01%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.72%
6M
1.79%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
4.69%
5Y*
3.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIL vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.69%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.40%-0.10%-0.01%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
1.72%4.24%5.27%5.12%1.58%0.04%0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between BIL and SGOV is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2020

0.57

The correlation between BIL and SGOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIL vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

SGOV
SGOV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIL vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BILSGOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-100.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

87.41

194.05

-106.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

353.28

395.07

-41.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2,801.36

4,426.92

-1,625.56

BIL vs. SGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIL Sharpe Ratio is 19.43, which is comparable to the SGOV Sharpe Ratio of 20.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIL and SGOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BIL vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIL drawdown since its inception was -0.78%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIL and SGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BILSGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-0.03%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.01%

-0.01%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.01%

-0.01%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.09%

-0.03%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.26%

-0.00%

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Volatility

BIL vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) has a higher volatility of 0.07% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.04%. This indicates that BIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BILSGOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.07%

0.04%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.14%

0.13%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20%

0.19%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.26%

0.24%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.26%

0.24%

+0.02%

BIL vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIL has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BIL vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison

BIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, which matches SGOV's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.85%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
3.85%4.10%5.10%4.87%1.45%0.03%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIL and SGOV have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIL has higher volatility (0.07%) compared to SGOV (0.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIL dropped -0.78% vs SGOV's -0.03%.

On 5-year performance, SGOV leads with 3.58% vs 3.45% for BIL. On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SGOV has performed better with a 3.58% return vs 3.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for BIL.

BIL and SGOV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 3.85%.

BIL is categorized as Government Bonds, while SGOV is Ultrashort Bond. BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index, while SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for BIL and 0.09% for SGOV.

SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.32 vs 19.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIL and SGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer