XSW vs. GXPT
XSW (SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF) and GXPT (Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - XSW tracks the S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index while GXPT tracks the MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSW charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPT.
Performance
XSW vs. GXPT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSW achieves a -4.56% return, which is significantly lower than GXPT's 17.49% return.
XSW
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 7.50%
- 6M
- -6.34%
- YTD
- -4.56%
- 1Y
- -3.96%
- 3Y*
- 8.75%
- 5Y*
- 1.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.25%
GXPT
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 17.10%
- YTD
- 17.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XSW vs. GXPT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | -4.56% | -2.99% |
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 17.49% | 11.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSW and GXPT is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSW vs. GXPT — Risk / Return Rank
XSW
GXPT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XSW vs. GXPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSW | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.24 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSW vs. GXPT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSW drawdown since its inception was -45.38%, which is greater than GXPT's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSW and GXPT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSW | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.38% | -18.74% | -26.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.97% | -8.22% | -4.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.88% | -5.23% | -4.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.67% | — | — |
Volatility
XSW vs. GXPT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSW | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.88% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.53% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.16% | 22.98% | +6.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.04% | 22.98% | +6.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.29% | 22.98% | +3.31% |
XSW vs. GXPT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSW vs. GXPT - Dividend Comparison
XSW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GXPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 0.22% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.20% | 0.09% | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.12% | 0.31% | 0.46% | 0.87% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSW and GXPT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XSW.
GXPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.00% for XSW.
XSW tracks S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSW and 0.15% for GXPT.
Find the right allocation for XSW and GXPT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer