GXPT vs. AIS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GXPT (Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF) and AIS (VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. GXPT is passively managed, while AIS is actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GXPT charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AIS.

Performance

GXPT vs. AIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXPT achieves a 25.98% return, which is significantly lower than AIS's 118.61% return.

GXPT

• 1D: -1.60%
• 1M: 17.05%
• YTD: 25.98%
• 6M: 24.94%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AIS

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 35.87%
• YTD: 118.61%
• 6M: 122.65%
• 1Y: 226.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXPT vs. AIS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF	25.98%	10.78%
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	118.61%	29.99%

Correlation

The correlation between GXPT and AIS is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.79

Return for Risk

GXPT vs. AIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIS

AIS Risk / Return Rank: 97
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXPT vs. AIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GXPT	AIS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	6.34	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.23	3.24	-1.01

Drawdowns

GXPT vs. AIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXPT drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, smaller than the maximum AIS drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPT and AIS.

Drawdown Indicators

	GXPT	AIS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.74%	-32.78%	+14.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.60%	0.00%	-1.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.93%	-5.45%	+0.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.80%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GXPT	AIS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	16.12%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	29.95%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.22%	36.00%	-14.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.22%	38.04%	-16.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.22%	38.04%	-16.82%

GXPT vs. AIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXPT has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AIS's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

GXPT vs. AIS - Dividend Comparison

GXPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, while AIS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	0.00%	0.00%
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF	0.11%	0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GXPT and AIS in my portfolio?

GXPT and AIS have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GXPT or AIS?

On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GXPT or AIS?

GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GXPT or AIS?

GXPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for AIS.

What is the main difference between GXPT and AIS?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPT and 0.75% for AIS.