XSW vs. IGV
XSW (SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF) and IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - XSW tracks the S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index while IGV tracks the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSW returned 12.80%/yr vs 15.70%/yr for IGV. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XSW charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGV.
Performance
XSW vs. IGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSW achieves a -13.68% return, which is significantly higher than IGV's -17.37% return. Over the past 10 years, XSW has underperformed IGV with an annualized return of 12.80%, while IGV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.70% annualized return.
XSW
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- -13.68%
- 6M
- -15.49%
- 1Y
- -10.86%
- 3Y*
- 8.06%
- 5Y*
- -1.20%
- 10Y*
- 12.80%
IGV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -7.10%
- YTD
- -17.37%
- 6M
- -19.19%
- 1Y
- -17.89%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 2.37%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
XSW vs. IGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | -13.68% | -0.90% | 25.81% | 38.60% | -34.22% | 7.47% | 52.41% | 36.50% | 7.67% | 27.94% |
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | -17.37% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 12.30% | 52.86% | 34.33% | 12.44% | 42.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSW and IGV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011 | 0.86 |
The correlation between XSW and IGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
XSW vs. IGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSW
IGV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XSW
IGV
Financial Services
XSW
IGV
Communication Services
XSW
IGV
Consumer Cyclical
XSW
IGV
Healthcare
XSW
IGV
-
Industrials
XSW
IGV
Basic Materials
XSW
-
IGV
-
Consumer Defensive
XSW
-
IGV
-
Energy
XSW
-
IGV
-
Real Estate
XSW
-
IGV
-
Utilities
XSW
-
IGV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSW vs. IGV — Risk / Return Rank
XSW
IGV
XSW vs. IGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSW | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.91 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | -0.49 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.67 | -1.00 | +0.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSW vs. IGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSW drawdown since its inception was -45.38%, smaller than the maximum IGV drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSW and IGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSW | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.38% | -63.45% | +18.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.75% | -36.61% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.75% | -36.61% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.38% | -45.85% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.38% | -45.85% | +0.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.30% | -25.85% | +4.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.86% | -14.46% | +4.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.31% | 17.94% | -1.63% |
Volatility
XSW vs. IGV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) is 11.42%, while iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) has a volatility of 12.71%. This indicates that XSW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSW | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.42% | 12.71% | -1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.81% | 24.86% | -1.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.83% | 28.27% | +0.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.89% | 27.97% | +0.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.26% | 26.38% | -0.12% |
XSW vs. IGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IGV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSW vs. IGV - Dividend Comparison
XSW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.20% | 0.09% | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.12% | 0.31% | 0.46% | 0.87% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSW and IGV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGV has higher volatility (12.71%) compared to XSW (11.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSW dropped -45.38% vs IGV's -63.45%.
On 10-year performance, IGV leads with 15.70% vs 12.80% for XSW. On fees, XSW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XSW has been the lower-risk option at 11.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IGV has performed better with a 15.70% return vs 12.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGV.
IGV has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for XSW.
XSW tracks S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSW and 0.39% for IGV.
XSW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.38 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSW and IGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer