PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSW vs. IGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSW vs. IGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSW achieves a -6.38% return, which is significantly lower than IGV's -5.19% return. Over the past 10 years, XSW has underperformed IGV with an annualized return of 13.33%, while IGV has yielded a comparatively higher 16.89% annualized return.


XSW

1D
-4.18%
1M
9.35%
YTD
-6.38%
6M
-7.49%
1Y
-4.24%
3Y*
11.02%
5Y*
1.69%
10Y*
13.33%

IGV

1D
-4.33%
1M
13.30%
YTD
-5.19%
6M
-6.07%
1Y
-4.56%
3Y*
14.91%
5Y*
6.80%
10Y*
16.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSW vs. IGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSW
SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF
-6.38%-0.90%25.81%38.60%-34.22%7.47%52.41%36.50%7.67%27.94%
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET
-5.19%5.56%23.41%58.56%-35.65%12.30%52.86%34.33%12.44%42.16%

Correlation

The correlation between XSW and IGV is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2011

0.86

The correlation between XSW and IGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

XSW vs. IGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSW
IGV

Technology

86.5%
89.2%

Financial Services

8.1%
1.8%

Communication Services

2.9%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
0.3%

Industrials

0.8%
0.2%

Healthcare

0.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XSW
86.5%
IGV
89.2%

Financial Services

XSW
8.1%
IGV
1.8%

Communication Services

XSW
2.9%
IGV
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XSW
1.0%
IGV
0.3%

Industrials

XSW
0.8%
IGV
0.2%

Healthcare

XSW
0.7%
IGV

-

Basic Materials

XSW

-

IGV

-

Consumer Defensive

XSW

-

IGV

-

Energy

XSW

-

IGV

-

Real Estate

XSW

-

IGV

-

Utilities

XSW

-

IGV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSW vs. IGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSW
XSW Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
XSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSW Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
XSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSW Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

IGV
IGV Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
IGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGV Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
IGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGV Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSW vs. IGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSWIGVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.15

-0.17

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.01

-0.04

+0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.99

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.13

-0.13

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.27

-0.27

0.00

XSW vs. IGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSW Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is comparable to the IGV Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSW and IGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSWIGVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

-0.17

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.25

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.64

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.37

+0.26

Drawdowns

XSW vs. IGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSW drawdown since its inception was -45.38%, smaller than the maximum IGV drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSW and IGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSWIGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.38%

-63.45%

+18.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.75%

-36.61%

+2.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.75%

-36.61%

+2.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.38%

-45.85%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.38%

-45.85%

+0.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.64%

-14.93%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.83%

-14.44%

+4.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.71%

17.22%

-1.51%

Volatility

XSW vs. IGV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) is 10.68%, while iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) has a volatility of 11.63%. This indicates that XSW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSWIGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.68%

11.63%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.51%

24.39%

-0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.63%

27.61%

+1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.79%

27.86%

+0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.25%

26.35%

-0.10%

XSW vs. IGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IGV's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSW vs. IGV - Dividend Comparison

XSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while IGV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.01%0.00%0.35%0.02%0.16%0.09%0.82%0.22%
XSW
SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF
0.04%0.06%0.07%0.20%0.09%0.13%0.26%0.12%0.31%0.46%0.87%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSW and IGV have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGV has higher volatility (11.63%) compared to XSW (10.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSW dropped -45.38% vs IGV's -63.45%.

On 10-year performance, IGV leads with 16.89% vs 13.33% for XSW. On fees, XSW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XSW has been the lower-risk option at 10.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IGV has performed better with a 16.89% return vs 13.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XSW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IGV.

XSW has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for IGV.

XSW tracks S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while IGV tracks S&P North American Technology-Software Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSW and 0.46% for IGV.

XSW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSW and IGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer