XSW vs. BUG
XSW (SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF) and BUG (Global X Cybersecurity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - XSW tracks the S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index while BUG tracks the Indxx Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSW returned 1.69%/yr vs 6.86%/yr for BUG. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XSW charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for BUG.
Performance
XSW vs. BUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSW achieves a -6.38% return, which is significantly lower than BUG's 20.72% return.
XSW
- 1D
- -4.18%
- 1M
- 9.35%
- YTD
- -6.38%
- 6M
- -7.49%
- 1Y
- -4.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.02%
- 5Y*
- 1.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.33%
BUG
- 1D
- -4.04%
- 1M
- 33.08%
- YTD
- 20.72%
- 6M
- 15.17%
- 1Y
- 2.89%
- 3Y*
- 15.82%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- —
XSW vs. BUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | -6.38% | -0.90% | 25.81% | 38.60% | -34.22% | 7.47% | 52.41% | 6.19% |
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 20.72% | -5.04% | 9.59% | 41.40% | -33.63% | 13.24% | 70.83% | 6.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSW and BUG is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2019 | 0.85 |
The correlation between XSW and BUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
XSW vs. BUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSW
BUG
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XSW
BUG
Financial Services
XSW
BUG
-
Communication Services
XSW
BUG
Consumer Cyclical
XSW
BUG
Industrials
XSW
BUG
-
Healthcare
XSW
BUG
Basic Materials
XSW
-
BUG
-
Consumer Defensive
XSW
-
BUG
Energy
XSW
-
BUG
-
Real Estate
XSW
-
BUG
-
Utilities
XSW
-
BUG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSW vs. BUG — Risk / Return Rank
XSW
BUG
XSW vs. BUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSW | BUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | 0.09 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | 0.34 | -0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.04 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 0.08 | -0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | 0.16 | -0.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSW | BUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 | 0.09 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.24 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.49 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
XSW vs. BUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSW drawdown since its inception was -45.38%, which is greater than BUG's maximum drawdown of -41.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSW and BUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSW | BUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.38% | -41.66% | -3.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.75% | -37.69% | +3.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.75% | -37.69% | +3.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.38% | -41.66% | -3.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.64% | -4.62% | -10.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.83% | -14.42% | +4.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.71% | 18.36% | -2.65% |
Volatility
XSW vs. BUG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) is 10.68%, while Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) has a volatility of 14.07%. This indicates that XSW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSW | BUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.68% | 14.07% | -3.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.51% | 25.81% | -2.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.63% | 30.78% | -2.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.79% | 28.47% | +0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.25% | 29.33% | -3.08% |
XSW vs. BUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BUG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSW vs. BUG - Dividend Comparison
XSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, more than BUG's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.09% | 0.10% | 1.56% | 0.66% | 0.46% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | 0.04% | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.20% | 0.09% | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.12% | 0.31% | 0.46% | 0.87% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSW and BUG have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUG has higher volatility (14.07%) compared to XSW (10.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSW dropped -45.38% vs BUG's -41.66%.
On 5-year performance, BUG leads with 6.86% vs 1.69% for XSW. On fees, XSW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XSW has been the lower-risk option at 10.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BUG has performed better with a 6.86% return vs 1.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BUG.
XSW has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.03% for BUG.
XSW tracks S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while BUG tracks Indxx Cybersecurity Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSW and 0.50% for BUG.
BUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSW and BUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer