GXPT vs. VGT
GXPT (Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - GXPT tracks the MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index while VGT tracks the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GXPT charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
GXPT vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXPT achieves a 16.86% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 23.32% return.
GXPT
- 1D
- -3.44%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- 16.86%
- 6M
- 15.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGT
- 1D
- -3.68%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 23.32%
- 6M
- 21.50%
- 1Y
- 46.82%
- 3Y*
- 30.13%
- 5Y*
- 19.51%
- 10Y*
- 25.49%
GXPT vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 16.86% | 11.47% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 23.32% | 11.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXPT and VGT is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXPT vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
GXPT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VGT
GXPT vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXPT | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.87 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.76 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXPT vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXPT drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPT and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXPT | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.74% | -54.63% | +35.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.72% | -7.71% | -1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.04% | -7.95% | +2.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.36% | — |
Volatility
GXPT vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXPT | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.91% | 22.72% | +0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.91% | 25.55% | -2.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.91% | 24.77% | -1.86% |
GXPT vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXPT has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GXPT vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
GXPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than VGT's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 0.12% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, GXPT and VGT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GXPT.
VGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.12% for GXPT.
GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPT and 0.09% for VGT.
Find the right allocation for GXPT and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer