PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXPT vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXPT vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXPT achieves a 15.96% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 20.36% return.


GXPT

1D
-0.44%
1M
-0.06%
6M
18.54%
YTD
15.96%
1Y
29.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
28.57%

VGT

1D
-0.38%
1M
-1.30%
6M
21.30%
YTD
20.36%
1Y
34.81%
3Y*
26.48%
5Y*
17.81%
10Y*
24.06%
ALL TIME*
14.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$16.90M$9.61M$5.72M
$440.89M$515.41M$573.34M

GXPT vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GXPT and VGT is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025

0.98

The correlation between GXPT and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXPT vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GXPT
GXPT Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
GXPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXPT Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
GXPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXPT Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GXPT vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GXPTVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.23

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

1.94

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.74

5.23

-1.49

GXPT vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GXPT Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GXPT and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GXPT vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXPT drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPT and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXPTVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.74%

-54.63%

+35.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.74%

-16.40%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.42%

-9.93%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-7.95%

+2.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.11%

6.07%

+1.04%

Volatility

GXPT vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) is 7.73%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 8.42%. This indicates that GXPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXPTVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.73%

8.42%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.35%

20.14%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.54%

24.28%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.29%

25.83%

-2.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.29%

24.89%

-1.60%

GXPT vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXPT has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GXPT vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

GXPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than VGT's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GXPT
Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF
0.22%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.38%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, GXPT and VGT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VGT has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to GXPT (7.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXPT dropped -18.74% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 1-year performance, VGT leads with 34.81% vs 29.12% for GXPT. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GXPT has been the lower-risk option at 7.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VGT has performed better with a 34.81% return vs 29.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GXPT.

VGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.22% for GXPT.

GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPT and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXPT and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer