XSW vs. XLK
XSW (SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Technology Equities funds from State Street - XSW tracks the S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index while XLK tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSW returned 12.80%/yr vs 25.48%/yr for XLK. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSW charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
XSW vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSW achieves a -13.68% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 28.25% return. Over the past 10 years, XSW has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 12.80%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.48% annualized return.
XSW
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- -13.68%
- 6M
- -15.49%
- 1Y
- -10.86%
- 3Y*
- 8.06%
- 5Y*
- -1.20%
- 10Y*
- 12.80%
XLK
- 1D
- -4.14%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- YTD
- 28.25%
- 6M
- 26.51%
- 1Y
- 52.47%
- 3Y*
- 30.61%
- 5Y*
- 21.34%
- 10Y*
- 25.48%
XSW vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | -13.68% | -0.90% | 25.81% | 38.60% | -34.22% | 7.47% | 52.41% | 36.50% | 7.67% | 27.94% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.25% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSW and XLK is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011 | 0.73 |
The correlation between XSW and XLK shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.75 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XSW vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSW
XLK
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XSW
XLK
Financial Services
XSW
XLK
-
Communication Services
XSW
XLK
-
Consumer Cyclical
XSW
XLK
-
Healthcare
XSW
XLK
-
Industrials
XSW
XLK
Basic Materials
XSW
-
XLK
-
Consumer Defensive
XSW
-
XLK
-
Energy
XSW
-
XLK
Real Estate
XSW
-
XLK
-
Utilities
XSW
-
XLK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSW vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
XSW
XLK
XSW vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSW | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.38 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 3.31 | -3.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.67 | 10.56 | -11.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSW vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSW drawdown since its inception was -45.38%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSW and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSW | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.38% | -82.05% | +36.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.75% | -15.92% | -17.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.75% | -25.66% | -8.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.38% | -33.56% | -11.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.38% | -33.56% | -11.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.30% | -6.96% | -14.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.86% | -34.90% | +25.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.31% | 4.98% | +11.33% |
Volatility
XSW vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) is 11.42%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 12.51%. This indicates that XSW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSW | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.42% | 12.51% | -1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.81% | 19.70% | +4.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.83% | 23.48% | +5.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.89% | 25.37% | +3.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.26% | 24.71% | +1.55% |
XSW vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSW vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
XSW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.43% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.20% | 0.09% | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.12% | 0.31% | 0.46% | 0.87% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSW and XLK have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (12.51%) compared to XSW (11.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSW dropped -45.38% vs XLK's -82.05%.
On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.48% vs 12.80% for XSW. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XSW has been the lower-risk option at 11.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.48% return vs 12.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XSW.
XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.00% for XSW.
XSW tracks S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSW and 0.08% for XLK.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSW and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer