XSW vs. XLK
XSW (SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Technology Equities funds from State Street - XSW tracks the S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index while XLK tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSW returned 13.25%/yr vs 24.50%/yr for XLK. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSW charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
XSW vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSW achieves a -4.56% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 26.22% return. Over the past 10 years, XSW has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 13.25%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 24.50% annualized return.
XSW
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 7.50%
- 6M
- -6.34%
- YTD
- -4.56%
- 1Y
- -3.96%
- 3Y*
- 8.75%
- 5Y*
- 1.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.25%
XLK
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- 6M
- 23.80%
- YTD
- 26.22%
- 1Y
- 42.45%
- 3Y*
- 28.08%
- 5Y*
- 19.72%
- 10Y*
- 24.50%
XSW vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | -4.56% | -0.90% | 25.81% | 38.60% | -34.22% | 7.47% | 52.41% | 36.50% | 7.67% | 27.94% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 26.22% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSW and XLK is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XSW and XLK has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XSW vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSW
XLK
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XSW
XLK
Financial Services
XSW
XLK
-
Communication Services
XSW
XLK
-
Consumer Cyclical
XSW
XLK
-
Healthcare
XSW
XLK
-
Industrials
XSW
XLK
Basic Materials
XSW
-
XLK
-
Consumer Defensive
XSW
-
XLK
-
Energy
XSW
-
XLK
Real Estate
XSW
-
XLK
-
Utilities
XSW
-
XLK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSW vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
XSW
XLK
XSW vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSW | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.30 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 2.68 | -2.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.24 | 8.10 | -8.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSW vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSW drawdown since its inception was -45.38%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSW and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSW | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.38% | -82.05% | +36.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.75% | -15.92% | -17.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.75% | -25.66% | -8.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.38% | -33.56% | -11.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.38% | -33.56% | -11.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.97% | -8.43% | -4.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.88% | -34.85% | +24.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.67% | 5.25% | +11.42% |
Volatility
XSW vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) is 7.88%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 11.01%. This indicates that XSW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSW | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.88% | 11.01% | -3.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.53% | 20.77% | +3.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.16% | 24.43% | +4.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.04% | 25.56% | +3.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.29% | 24.79% | +1.50% |
XSW vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSW vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
XSW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.44% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.20% | 0.09% | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.12% | 0.31% | 0.46% | 0.87% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSW and XLK have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (11.01%) compared to XSW (7.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSW dropped -45.38% vs XLK's -82.05%.
On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 24.50% vs 13.25% for XSW. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XSW has been the lower-risk option at 7.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 24.50% return vs 13.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XSW.
XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.00% for XSW.
XSW tracks S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSW and 0.08% for XLK.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSW and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer