PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXPT vs. TRUT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXPT vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXPT achieves a 17.60% return, which is significantly higher than TRUT's 16.06% return.


GXPT

1D
1.42%
1M
1.35%
6M
19.51%
YTD
17.60%
1Y
30.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
30.08%

TRUT

1D
1.39%
1M
1.38%
6M
17.81%
YTD
16.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$16.90M$9.50M$5.80M
$14.69M$9.27M$6.33M

GXPT vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GXPT and TRUT is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025

0.99

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXPT vs. TRUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GXPT
GXPT Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
GXPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXPT Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GXPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXPT Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

TRUT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GXPT vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GXPTTRUTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.35

GXPT vs. TRUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GXPT vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXPT drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, roughly equal to the maximum TRUT drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPT and TRUT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXPTTRUTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.74%

-18.55%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.14%

-8.73%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.46%

-5.75%

+0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.13%

Volatility

GXPT vs. TRUT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXPTTRUTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.53%

23.81%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.28%

23.81%

-0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.28%

23.81%

-0.53%

GXPT vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXPT has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GXPT vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison

GXPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than TRUT's 0.31% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, GXPT and TRUT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GXPT.

TRUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.22% for GXPT.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPT and 0.13% for TRUT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXPT and TRUT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer