GXPT vs. CHPS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GXPT (Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXPT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.

Performance

GXPT vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXPT achieves a 25.98% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 107.97% return.

GXPT

• 1D: -1.60%
• 1M: 17.05%
• YTD: 25.98%
• 6M: 24.94%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHPS

• 1D: 1.86%
• 1M: 32.32%
• YTD: 107.97%
• 6M: 109.04%
• 1Y: 223.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXPT vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF	25.98%	10.78%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	107.97%	35.50%

Correlation

The correlation between GXPT and CHPS is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.73

Return for Risk

GXPT vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 97
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXPT vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GXPT	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	6.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.23	1.81	+0.43

Drawdowns

GXPT vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXPT drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPT and CHPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	GXPT	CHPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.74%	-39.44%	+20.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.60%	0.00%	-1.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.93%	-9.16%	+4.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.50%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GXPT	CHPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.18%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	28.19%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.22%	34.43%	-13.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.22%	33.78%	-12.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.22%	33.78%	-12.56%

GXPT vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GXPT and CHPS have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GXPT vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

GXPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than CHPS's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.32%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF	0.11%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GXPT and CHPS in my portfolio?

GXPT and CHPS have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GXPT or CHPS?

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GXPT or CHPS?

GXPT and CHPS have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GXPT or CHPS?

CHPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.11% for GXPT.

What is the main difference between GXPT and CHPS?

GXPT is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Xtrackers.