PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXPT vs. FTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXPT vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXPT achieves a 17.60% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's 22.53% return.


GXPT

1D
1.42%
1M
1.35%
6M
19.51%
YTD
17.60%
1Y
30.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
30.08%

FTEC

1D
1.71%
1M
0.31%
6M
22.49%
YTD
22.53%
1Y
37.50%
3Y*
29.49%
5Y*
18.32%
10Y*
23.79%
ALL TIME*
21.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$86.23M$78.73M$94.95M
$16.90M$9.50M$5.80M

GXPT vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GXPT and FTEC is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025

0.98

The correlation between GXPT and FTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXPT vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GXPT
GXPT Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
GXPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXPT Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GXPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXPT Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

FTEC
FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GXPT vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GXPTFTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.26

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

2.32

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.35

6.23

-1.87

GXPT vs. FTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GXPT Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the FTEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GXPT and FTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GXPT vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXPT drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, smaller than the maximum FTEC drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPT and FTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXPTFTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.74%

-34.95%

+16.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.74%

-16.26%

-2.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.14%

-8.48%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.46%

-5.59%

+0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.13%

6.04%

+1.09%

Volatility

GXPT vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) is 7.76%, while Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a volatility of 8.41%. This indicates that GXPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXPTFTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.76%

8.41%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.32%

20.16%

-0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.53%

24.30%

-0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.28%

25.89%

-2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.28%

24.99%

-1.71%

GXPT vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXPT has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GXPT vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison

GXPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than FTEC's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.36%0.43%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%
GXPT
Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF
0.22%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, GXPT and FTEC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FTEC has higher volatility (8.41%) compared to GXPT (7.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXPT dropped -18.74% vs FTEC's -34.95%.

On 1-year performance, FTEC leads with 37.50% vs 30.95% for GXPT. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, GXPT has been the lower-risk option at 7.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 37.50% return vs 30.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GXPT.

FTEC has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.22% for GXPT.

GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index, while FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPT and 0.08% for FTEC.

FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXPT and FTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer