XOMO vs. FFLG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XOMO (YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF) and FFLG (Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOMO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while FFLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XOMO returned 31.56% vs 38.91% for FFLG. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. XOMO charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for FFLG.

Performance

XOMO vs. FFLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XOMO having a 16.83% return and FFLG slightly higher at 17.03%.

XOMO

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: -2.23%
• YTD: 16.83%
• 6M: 19.65%
• 1Y: 31.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FFLG

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 6.72%
• YTD: 17.03%
• 6M: 16.08%
• 1Y: 38.91%
• 3Y*: 29.35%
• 5Y*: 12.69%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOMO vs. FFLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF	16.83%	6.90%	6.11%	-8.62%
FFLG Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF	17.03%	19.61%	32.29%	9.69%

Correlation

The correlation between XOMO and FFLG is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2023	-0.06

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between XOMO and FFLG has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.06 to -0.27, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Return for Risk

XOMO vs. FFLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOMO

XOMO Risk / Return Rank: 44
XOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
XOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
XOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 45
XOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
XOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 41

FFLG

FFLG Risk / Return Rank: 61
FFLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
FFLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FFLG Omega Ratio Rank: 61
FFLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FFLG Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOMO vs. FFLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XOMO	FFLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	2.14	-0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	2.82	-0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.37	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	2.75	-0.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.43	10.74	-4.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XOMO vs. FFLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the FFLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOMO and FFLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XOMO	FFLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.58	2.14	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.44	-0.06

Drawdowns

XOMO vs. FFLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOMO drawdown since its inception was -18.90%, smaller than the maximum FFLG drawdown of -44.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOMO and FFLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	XOMO	FFLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.90%	-44.52%	+25.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.73%	-14.23%	+0.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.72%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-44.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.21%	-0.44%	-9.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.22%	-14.26%	+7.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.92%	3.63%	+1.29%

Volatility

XOMO vs. FFLG - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) has a higher volatility of 7.49% compared to Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) at 4.54%. This indicates that XOMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XOMO	FFLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.49%	4.54%	+2.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.60%	14.11%	+2.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.05%	18.28%	+1.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.93%	25.33%	-6.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.93%	25.38%	-6.45%

XOMO vs. FFLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOMO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than FFLG's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

XOMO vs. FFLG - Dividend Comparison

XOMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.68%, more than FFLG's 0.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FFLG Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF	0.13%	0.14%	0.09%	0.00%	1.50%	0.55%
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF	35.68%	31.64%	26.94%	5.13%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XOMO and FFLG in my portfolio?

XOMO and FFLG have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XOMO or FFLG?

XOMO has higher volatility (7.49%) compared to FFLG (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOMO dropped -18.90% vs FFLG's -44.52%.

Which ETF is better, XOMO or FFLG?

On 1-year performance, FFLG leads with 38.91% vs 31.56% for XOMO. On fees, FFLG is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, FFLG has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XOMO or FFLG?

Over the 1-year period, FFLG has performed better with a 38.91% return vs 31.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XOMO or FFLG?

FFLG is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XOMO or FFLG?

XOMO has the higher dividend yield at 35.68%, compared with 0.13% for FFLG.

What is the main difference between XOMO and FFLG?

XOMO is categorized as Derivative Income, while FFLG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for XOMO and 0.38% for FFLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.