PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FFLG vs. FBGRX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FFLGFBGRX
YTD Return33.99%37.67%
1Y Return50.62%52.51%
3Y Return (Ann)4.97%7.26%
Sharpe Ratio2.572.64
Sortino Ratio3.283.39
Omega Ratio1.461.47
Calmar Ratio2.072.43
Martin Ratio13.0712.93
Ulcer Index3.76%3.97%
Daily Std Dev19.18%19.41%
Max Drawdown-44.52%-57.42%
Current Drawdown0.00%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.01.0

The correlation between FFLG and FBGRX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

FFLG vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FFLG achieves a 33.99% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 37.67% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
26.81%
35.67%
FFLG
FBGRX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FFLG vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFLG has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.


FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
Expense ratio chart for FBGRX: current value at 0.79% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.79%
Expense ratio chart for FFLG: current value at 0.38% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.38%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FFLG vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFLG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FFLG, currently valued at 2.57, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.57
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FFLG, currently valued at 3.28, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.28
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FFLG, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.46
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FFLG, currently valued at 2.07, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.07
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FFLG, currently valued at 13.07, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0013.07
FBGRX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FBGRX, currently valued at 2.64, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.64
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FBGRX, currently valued at 3.39, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.39
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FBGRX, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.47
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FBGRX, currently valued at 2.43, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.43
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FBGRX, currently valued at 12.93, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0012.93

FFLG vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFLG Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFLG and FBGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.57
2.64
FFLG
FBGRX

Dividends

FFLG vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FFLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than FBGRX's 5.10% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FFLG
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF
0.03%0.00%1.50%0.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
5.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%0.09%0.22%5.07%6.08%7.80%

Drawdowns

FFLG vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLG drawdown since its inception was -44.52%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -57.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLG and FBGRX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember00
FFLG
FBGRX

Volatility

FFLG vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) have volatilities of 5.54% and 5.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.54%
5.39%
FFLG
FBGRX