PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FFLG vs. FFSM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FFLGFFSM
YTD Return33.73%24.52%
1Y Return47.57%42.58%
3Y Return (Ann)5.07%6.10%
Sharpe Ratio2.632.64
Sortino Ratio3.353.64
Omega Ratio1.471.46
Calmar Ratio2.262.72
Martin Ratio13.3716.16
Ulcer Index3.76%2.77%
Daily Std Dev19.11%16.93%
Max Drawdown-44.52%-26.65%
Current Drawdown-0.20%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between FFLG and FFSM is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

FFLG vs. FFSM - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FFLG achieves a 33.73% return, which is significantly higher than FFSM's 24.52% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.57%
13.42%
FFLG
FFSM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FFLG vs. FFSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFLG has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FFSM's 0.43% expense ratio.


FFSM
Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF
Expense ratio chart for FFSM: current value at 0.43% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.43%
Expense ratio chart for FFLG: current value at 0.38% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.38%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FFLG vs. FFSM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) and Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFLG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FFLG, currently valued at 2.63, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.63
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FFLG, currently valued at 3.35, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.35
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FFLG, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.47
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FFLG, currently valued at 2.26, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.26
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FFLG, currently valued at 13.37, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0013.37
FFSM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FFSM, currently valued at 2.64, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.64
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FFSM, currently valued at 3.64, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.64
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FFSM, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.46
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FFSM, currently valued at 2.72, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.72
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FFSM, currently valued at 16.16, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0016.16

FFLG vs. FFSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFLG Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the FFSM Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFLG and FFSM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.63
2.64
FFLG
FFSM

Dividends

FFLG vs. FFSM - Dividend Comparison

FFLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than FFSM's 0.50% yield.


TTM202320222021
FFLG
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF
0.03%0.00%1.50%0.55%
FFSM
Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF
0.50%0.56%0.58%0.37%

Drawdowns

FFLG vs. FFSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLG drawdown since its inception was -44.52%, which is greater than FFSM's maximum drawdown of -26.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLG and FFSM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.20%
0
FFLG
FFSM

Volatility

FFLG vs. FFSM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) is 5.48%, while Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) has a volatility of 5.91%. This indicates that FFLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.48%
5.91%
FFLG
FFSM