PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOMO vs. AMZY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOMO vs. AMZY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) and YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOMO achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly higher than AMZY's -1.83% return.


XOMO

1D
0.93%
1M
-6.78%
YTD
10.22%
6M
11.32%
1Y
16.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMZY

1D
0.57%
1M
-10.29%
YTD
-1.83%
6M
-1.84%
1Y
6.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOMO vs. AMZY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
10.22%6.90%6.11%-8.59%
AMZY
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
-1.83%10.39%35.28%10.65%

Correlation

The correlation between XOMO and AMZY is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2023

-0.07

The correlation between XOMO and AMZY shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOMO vs. AMZY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOMO
XOMO Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
XOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

AMZY
AMZY Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
AMZY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZY Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZY Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOMO vs. AMZY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) and YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XOMOAMZYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.07

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

0.35

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.99

0.83

+2.16

XOMO vs. AMZY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOMO Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is higher than the AMZY Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOMO and AMZY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XOMO vs. AMZY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOMO drawdown since its inception was -18.90%, smaller than the maximum AMZY drawdown of -23.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOMO and AMZY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOMOAMZYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.90%

-23.70%

+4.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.86%

-19.61%

+2.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.29%

-12.34%

-2.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.31%

-5.40%

-1.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.66%

8.20%

-2.54%

Volatility

XOMO vs. AMZY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) is 7.49%, while YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) has a volatility of 7.99%. This indicates that XOMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOMOAMZYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.49%

7.99%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.38%

17.06%

+0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.65%

24.24%

-3.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.13%

25.14%

-6.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.13%

25.14%

-6.01%

XOMO vs. AMZY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOMO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZY's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

XOMO vs. AMZY - Dividend Comparison

XOMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.38%, less than AMZY's 58.30% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMZY
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
58.30%52.59%47.91%9.90%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
37.38%31.64%26.94%5.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOMO and AMZY have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMZY has higher volatility (7.99%) compared to XOMO (7.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOMO dropped -18.90% vs AMZY's -23.70%.

On 1-year performance, XOMO leads with 16.88% vs 6.82% for AMZY. On fees, XOMO is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, XOMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XOMO has performed better with a 16.88% return vs 6.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XOMO is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for AMZY.

AMZY has the higher dividend yield at 58.30%, compared with 37.38% for XOMO.

Their fees differ too: 1.01% for XOMO and 1.09% for AMZY.

XOMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOMO and AMZY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer