PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOMO vs. YMAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOMO vs. YMAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) and YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOMO achieves a 15.65% return, which is significantly higher than YMAG's 4.70% return.


XOMO

1D
0.43%
1M
-2.45%
YTD
15.65%
6M
19.38%
1Y
30.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YMAG

1D
-0.55%
1M
2.88%
YTD
4.70%
6M
5.20%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOMO vs. YMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
15.65%6.90%4.07%
YMAG
YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs
4.70%18.64%36.05%

Correlation

The correlation between XOMO and YMAG is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024

-0.08

The correlation between XOMO and YMAG shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to -0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOMO vs. YMAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOMO
XOMO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
XOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

YMAG
YMAG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
YMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
YMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
YMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
YMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOMO vs. YMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) and YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XOMOYMAGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.52

1.75

-0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.03

2.36

-0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.30

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.00

+0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.38

7.06

-0.68

XOMO vs. YMAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the YMAG Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOMO and YMAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XOMOYMAGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

1.75

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

1.21

-0.85

Drawdowns

XOMO vs. YMAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOMO drawdown since its inception was -18.90%, smaller than the maximum YMAG drawdown of -25.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOMO and YMAG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOMOYMAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.90%

-25.96%

+7.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.73%

-14.38%

+0.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.12%

-1.86%

-9.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.21%

-4.53%

-2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.84%

4.08%

+0.76%

Volatility

XOMO vs. YMAG - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) at 3.54%. This indicates that XOMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YMAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOMOYMAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.38%

3.54%

+3.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.56%

11.48%

+5.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.03%

16.16%

+3.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.94%

20.89%

-1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.94%

20.89%

-1.95%

XOMO vs. YMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOMO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than YMAG's 1.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

XOMO vs. YMAG - Dividend Comparison

XOMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.25%, less than YMAG's 50.37% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
35.25%31.64%26.94%5.13%
YMAG
YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs
50.37%52.27%35.22%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOMO and YMAG have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOMO has higher volatility (7.38%) compared to YMAG (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOMO dropped -18.90% vs YMAG's -25.96%.

On 1-year performance, XOMO leads with 30.34% vs 28.12% for YMAG. On fees, XOMO is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, YMAG has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XOMO has performed better with a 30.34% return vs 28.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XOMO is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAG.

YMAG has the higher dividend yield at 50.37%, compared with 35.25% for XOMO.

XOMO is categorized as Derivative Income, while YMAG is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for XOMO and 1.28% for YMAG.

YMAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOMO and YMAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer