PortfoliosLab logo
FFLG vs. FFLV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FFLG and FFLV is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

FFLG vs. FFLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
9.00%
7.12%
FFLG
FFLV

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FFLG:

0.19

FFLV:

0.18

Sortino Ratio

FFLG:

0.43

FFLV:

0.49

Omega Ratio

FFLG:

1.06

FFLV:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

FFLG:

0.18

FFLV:

0.27

Martin Ratio

FFLG:

0.56

FFLV:

0.86

Ulcer Index

FFLG:

8.34%

FFLV:

5.31%

Daily Std Dev

FFLG:

27.46%

FFLV:

17.18%

Max Drawdown

FFLG:

-44.52%

FFLV:

-16.71%

Current Drawdown

FFLG:

-13.58%

FFLV:

-8.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFLG achieves a -8.41% return, which is significantly lower than FFLV's -0.85% return.


FFLG

YTD

-8.41%

1M

5.13%

6M

-9.58%

1Y

5.18%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FFLV

YTD

-0.85%

1M

2.71%

6M

-6.40%

1Y

3.07%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FFLG vs. FFLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FFLG and FFLV have an expense ratio of 0.38%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FFLG vs. FFLV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFLG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FFLG is 3232
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FFLG is 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FFLG is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FFLG is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FFLG is 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FFLG is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

FFLV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FFLV is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FFLV is 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FFLV is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FFLV is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FFLV is 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FFLV is 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FFLG vs. FFLV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FFLG Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is comparable to the FFLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFLG and FFLV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00Mar 02Mar 09Mar 16Mar 23Mar 30Apr 06Apr 13Apr 20Apr 27May 04
0.19
0.18
FFLG
FFLV

Dividends

FFLG vs. FFLV - Dividend Comparison

FFLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than FFLV's 1.77% yield.


TTM2024202320222021
FFLG
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF
0.10%0.09%0.00%1.50%0.55%
FFLV
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF
1.77%1.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FFLG vs. FFLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLG drawdown since its inception was -44.52%, which is greater than FFLV's maximum drawdown of -16.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLG and FFLV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-13.58%
-8.62%
FFLG
FFLV

Volatility

FFLG vs. FFLV - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) has a higher volatility of 8.88% compared to Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) at 5.51%. This indicates that FFLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
8.88%
5.51%
FFLG
FFLV