PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOMO vs. XOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOMO vs. XOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOMO achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly lower than XOM's 17.68% return.


XOMO

1D
0.93%
1M
-6.78%
YTD
10.22%
6M
11.32%
1Y
16.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XOM

1D
0.91%
1M
-9.81%
YTD
17.68%
6M
18.59%
1Y
29.04%
3Y*
14.69%
5Y*
21.08%
10Y*
9.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOMO vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
10.22%6.90%6.11%-8.59%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
17.68%15.98%11.26%-9.01%

Correlation

The correlation between XOMO and XOM is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2023

0.95

The correlation between XOMO and XOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOMO vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOMO
XOMO Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
XOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

XOM
XOM Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOM Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOMO vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XOMOXOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.21

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

1.53

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.99

4.55

-1.55

XOMO vs. XOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOMO Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is comparable to the XOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOMO and XOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XOMO vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOMO drawdown since its inception was -18.90%, smaller than the maximum XOM drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOMO and XOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOMOXOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.90%

-62.40%

+43.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.86%

-19.08%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.29%

-17.96%

+2.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.31%

-10.21%

+2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.66%

6.42%

-0.76%

Volatility

XOMO vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) is 7.49%, while Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) has a volatility of 8.03%. This indicates that XOMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOMOXOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.49%

8.03%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.38%

20.78%

-3.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.65%

24.86%

-4.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.13%

26.70%

-7.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.13%

28.24%

-9.11%

Dividends

XOMO vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison

XOMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.38%, more than XOM's 2.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
2.92%3.32%3.57%3.68%3.22%5.70%8.44%4.92%4.74%3.66%3.30%3.69%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
37.38%31.64%26.94%5.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, XOMO and XOM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XOM has higher volatility (8.03%) compared to XOMO (7.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOMO dropped -18.90% vs XOM's -62.40%.

XOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOMO and XOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer