PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOMO vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOMO vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOMO achieves a 15.65% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 11.69% return.


XOMO

1D
0.43%
1M
-2.45%
YTD
15.65%
6M
19.38%
1Y
30.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOMO vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
15.65%6.90%6.11%-8.62%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%6.39%

Correlation

The correlation between XOMO and VOO is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2023

0.07

The correlation between XOMO and VOO shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOMO vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOMO
XOMO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
XOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOMO vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XOMOVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.52

2.53

-1.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.03

3.43

-1.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.46

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

3.42

-1.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.38

15.95

-9.56

XOMO vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOMO and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XOMOVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

2.53

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.89

-0.53

Drawdowns

XOMO vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOMO drawdown since its inception was -18.90%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOMO and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOMOVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.90%

-33.99%

+15.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.73%

-8.90%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.12%

0.00%

-11.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.21%

-3.69%

-3.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.84%

1.91%

+2.93%

Volatility

XOMO vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that XOMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOMOVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.38%

2.74%

+4.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.56%

8.88%

+7.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.03%

11.78%

+8.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.94%

16.81%

+2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.94%

18.01%

+0.93%

XOMO vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOMO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

XOMO vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

XOMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.25%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
35.25%31.64%26.94%5.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOMO and VOO have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOMO has higher volatility (7.38%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOMO dropped -18.90% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 1-year performance, XOMO leads with 30.34% vs 29.68% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XOMO has performed better with a 30.34% return vs 29.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.

XOMO has the higher dividend yield at 35.25%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.

XOMO is categorized as Derivative Income, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for XOMO and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOMO and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer