XOMO vs. VOO
XOMO (YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOMO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. XOMO is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. Over the past year, XOMO returned 30.34% vs 29.68% for VOO. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XOMO charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
XOMO vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOMO achieves a 15.65% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 11.69% return.
XOMO
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -2.45%
- YTD
- 15.65%
- 6M
- 19.38%
- 1Y
- 30.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 6M
- 12.11%
- 1Y
- 29.68%
- 3Y*
- 22.73%
- 5Y*
- 14.26%
- 10Y*
- 15.65%
XOMO vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 15.65% | 6.90% | 6.11% | -8.62% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 11.69% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 6.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOMO and VOO is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2023 | 0.07 |
The correlation between XOMO and VOO shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOMO vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
XOMO
VOO
XOMO vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XOMO | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.52 | 2.53 | -1.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.03 | 3.43 | -1.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.46 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | 3.42 | -1.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.38 | 15.95 | -9.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XOMO | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 2.53 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.89 | -0.53 |
Drawdowns
XOMO vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOMO drawdown since its inception was -18.90%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOMO and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOMO | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.90% | -33.99% | +15.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.73% | -8.90% | -4.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.12% | 0.00% | -11.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.21% | -3.69% | -3.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.84% | 1.91% | +2.93% |
Volatility
XOMO vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that XOMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOMO | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.38% | 2.74% | +4.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.56% | 8.88% | +7.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.03% | 11.78% | +8.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 16.81% | +2.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 18.01% | +0.93% |
XOMO vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOMO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOMO vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
XOMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.25%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.02% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 35.25% | 31.64% | 26.94% | 5.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOMO and VOO have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOMO has higher volatility (7.38%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOMO dropped -18.90% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 1-year performance, XOMO leads with 30.34% vs 29.68% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XOMO has performed better with a 30.34% return vs 29.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.
XOMO has the higher dividend yield at 35.25%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.
XOMO is categorized as Derivative Income, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for XOMO and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOMO and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer