XLY vs. ACWX

Last updated Jun 12, 2026

XLY (Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund) and ACWX (iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLY is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, while ACWX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLY returned 12.72%/yr vs 9.87%/yr for ACWX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLY charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWX.

Performance

XLY vs. ACWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLY achieves a -2.41% return, which is significantly lower than ACWX's 13.42% return. Over the past 10 years, XLY has outperformed ACWX with an annualized return of 12.72%, while ACWX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.87% annualized return.

XLY

• 1D: 2.48%
• 1M: -1.68%
• YTD: -2.41%
• 6M: -2.84%
• 1Y: 9.18%
• 3Y*: 13.28%
• 5Y*: 6.94%
• 10Y*: 12.72%

ACWX

• 1D: 3.41%
• 1M: 1.94%
• YTD: 13.42%
• 6M: 14.35%
• 1Y: 28.83%
• 3Y*: 18.66%
• 5Y*: 8.17%
• 10Y*: 9.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLY vs. ACWX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund	-2.41%	7.37%	26.51%	39.64%	-36.27%	27.93%	29.63%	28.39%	1.58%	22.82%
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF	13.42%	32.59%	5.17%	15.63%	-16.07%	7.67%	10.29%	21.05%	-13.99%	27.20%

Correlation

The correlation between XLY and ACWX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2008	0.71

The correlation between XLY and ACWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLY vs. ACWX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLY	ACWX
Consumer Cyclical	97.6%	7.3%
Communication Services	1.3%	4.7%
Technology	0.9%	22.4%
Industrials	0.1%	14.0%
Basic Materials	-	6.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	5.0%
Energy	-	4.8%
Financial Services	-	23.3%
Healthcare	-	6.7%
Real Estate	-	1.2%
Utilities	-	2.8%

Return for Risk

XLY vs. ACWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLY

XLY Risk / Return Rank: 19
XLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
XLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
XLY Omega Ratio Rank: 18
XLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
XLY Martin Ratio Rank: 20

ACWX

ACWX Risk / Return Rank: 64
ACWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
ACWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
ACWX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
ACWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
ACWX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLY vs. ACWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLY	ACWX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.50	1.76	-1.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.83	2.43	-1.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.32	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.62	2.53	-1.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.89	9.69	-7.80

XLY vs. ACWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLY Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the ACWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLY and ACWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XLY vs. ACWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLY drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, roughly equal to the maximum ACWX drawdown of -60.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLY and ACWX.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLY	ACWX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.05%	-60.40%	+1.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.98%	-11.42%	-3.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.01%	-13.84%	-12.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.67%	-30.07%	-9.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.67%	-35.38%	-4.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.41%	-1.82%	-4.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.55%	-13.32%	+3.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.86%	2.98%	+1.88%

Volatility

XLY vs. ACWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) is 6.20%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) has a volatility of 7.03%. This indicates that XLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLY	ACWX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.20%	7.03%	-0.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.52%	14.36%	-0.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.29%	16.43%	+1.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.84%	16.46%	+7.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.08%	17.43%	+4.65%

XLY vs. ACWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWX's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLY vs. ACWX - Dividend Comparison

XLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than ACWX's 2.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF	2.49%	2.82%	2.97%	2.96%	2.68%	2.74%	1.88%	3.22%	2.60%	2.40%	2.77%	2.51%
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund	0.77%	0.79%	0.72%	0.78%	1.00%	0.53%	0.82%	1.28%	1.34%	1.20%	1.71%	1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLY and ACWX in my portfolio?

XLY and ACWX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XLY or ACWX?

ACWX has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to XLY (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLY dropped -59.05% vs ACWX's -60.40%.

Which ETF is better, XLY or ACWX?

On 10-year performance, XLY leads with 12.72% vs 9.87% for ACWX. On fees, XLY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, XLY has been the lower-risk option at 6.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XLY or ACWX?

Over the 10-year period, XLY has performed better with a 12.72% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLY or ACWX?

XLY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLY or ACWX?

ACWX has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 0.77% for XLY.

What is the main difference between XLY and ACWX?

XLY is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while ACWX is Foreign Large Cap Equities. XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, while ACWX tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLY and 0.32% for ACWX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.