PortfoliosLab logo
XLY vs. QQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between XLY and QQQ is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

XLY vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

700.00%800.00%900.00%1,000.00%1,100.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
842.73%
1,026.64%
XLY
QQQ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

XLY:

0.57

QQQ:

0.47

Sortino Ratio

XLY:

0.91

QQQ:

0.81

Omega Ratio

XLY:

1.12

QQQ:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

XLY:

0.50

QQQ:

0.51

Martin Ratio

XLY:

1.49

QQQ:

1.67

Ulcer Index

XLY:

8.72%

QQQ:

6.93%

Daily Std Dev

XLY:

25.07%

QQQ:

25.14%

Max Drawdown

XLY:

-59.05%

QQQ:

-82.98%

Current Drawdown

XLY:

-15.48%

QQQ:

-9.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLY achieves a -9.96% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's -4.34% return. Over the past 10 years, XLY has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 11.48%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 17.21% annualized return.


XLY

YTD

-9.96%

1M

14.23%

6M

-4.59%

1Y

14.27%

5Y*

12.38%

10Y*

11.48%

QQQ

YTD

-4.34%

1M

17.36%

6M

-4.62%

1Y

11.64%

5Y*

17.57%

10Y*

17.21%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XLY vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

XLY vs. QQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLY is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLY is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLY is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLY is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLY is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLY is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQ is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

XLY vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current XLY Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLY and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.57
0.47
XLY
QQQ

Dividends

XLY vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

XLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than QQQ's 0.61% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.88%0.72%0.78%1.00%0.53%0.82%1.28%1.34%1.20%1.71%1.43%1.31%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ
0.61%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%1.41%

Drawdowns

XLY vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLY drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLY and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-15.48%
-9.36%
XLY
QQQ

Volatility

XLY vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) is 12.93%, while Invesco QQQ (QQQ) has a volatility of 13.83%. This indicates that XLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
12.93%
13.83%
XLY
QQQ