PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLY vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLY vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLY achieves a -3.36% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.41% return. Over the past 10 years, XLY has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 12.85%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.48% annualized return.


XLY

1D
-1.70%
1M
-3.37%
YTD
-3.36%
6M
-5.67%
1Y
10.19%
3Y*
12.50%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
12.85%

QQQ

1D
-0.25%
1M
2.96%
YTD
20.41%
6M
19.46%
1Y
40.91%
3Y*
27.47%
5Y*
16.94%
10Y*
22.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLY vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
-3.36%7.37%26.51%39.64%-36.27%27.93%29.63%28.39%1.58%22.82%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
20.41%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between XLY and QQQ is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 1999

0.74

The correlation between XLY and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLY vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLY
QQQ

Consumer Cyclical

97.3%
11.4%

Communication Services

1.5%
14.3%

Technology

0.9%
58.7%

Industrials

0.1%
2.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.4%

Energy

-

0.5%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

3.7%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XLY
97.3%
QQQ
11.4%

Communication Services

XLY
1.5%
QQQ
14.3%

Technology

XLY
0.9%
QQQ
58.7%

Industrials

XLY
0.1%
QQQ
2.6%

Basic Materials

XLY

-

QQQ
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

XLY

-

QQQ
6.4%

Energy

XLY

-

QQQ
0.5%

Financial Services

XLY

-

QQQ
0.2%

Healthcare

XLY

-

QQQ
3.7%

Real Estate

XLY

-

QQQ
0.1%

Utilities

XLY

-

QQQ
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLY vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLY
XLY Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLY Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
XLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLY Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLY vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLYQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.41

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

3.44

-2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.07

12.79

-10.72

XLY vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLY Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLY and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLY vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLY drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLY and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLYQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.05%

-82.97%

+23.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.98%

-11.96%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.01%

-22.77%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.67%

-35.12%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.67%

-35.12%

-4.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.32%

-0.99%

-6.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.55%

-32.73%

+23.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.94%

3.21%

+1.73%

Volatility

XLY vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) is 6.47%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 8.47%. This indicates that XLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLYQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.47%

8.47%

-2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.88%

14.20%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.55%

17.67%

+0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.90%

22.64%

+1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.12%

22.43%

-0.31%

XLY vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLY vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

XLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than QQQ's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.49%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.98%0.79%0.72%0.78%1.00%0.53%0.82%1.28%1.34%1.20%1.71%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLY and QQQ have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (8.47%) compared to XLY (6.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLY dropped -59.05% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.48% vs 12.85% for XLY. On fees, XLY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, XLY has been the lower-risk option at 6.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.48% return vs 12.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.

XLY has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.49% for QQQ.

XLY is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLY and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLY and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer