XLY vs. XRT
XLY (Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund) and XRT (SPDR S&P Retail ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds from State Street - XLY tracks the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index while XRT tracks the S&P Retail Select Industry. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLY returned 12.73%/yr vs 9.25%/yr for XRT. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLY charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XRT.
Performance
XLY vs. XRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLY achieves a -4.35% return, which is significantly lower than XRT's 1.06% return. Over the past 10 years, XLY has outperformed XRT with an annualized return of 12.73%, while XRT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.25% annualized return.
XLY
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- -4.35%
- 6M
- -6.51%
- 1Y
- 6.94%
- 3Y*
- 12.11%
- 5Y*
- 6.04%
- 10Y*
- 12.73%
XRT
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 4.15%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 6M
- -0.21%
- 1Y
- 12.05%
- 3Y*
- 12.88%
- 5Y*
- -0.91%
- 10Y*
- 9.25%
XLY vs. XRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | -4.35% | 7.37% | 26.51% | 39.64% | -36.27% | 27.93% | 29.63% | 28.39% | 1.58% | 22.82% |
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | 1.06% | 8.07% | 11.78% | 21.53% | -31.64% | 42.60% | 41.91% | 14.12% | -8.04% | 4.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLY and XRT is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | 0.79 |
The correlation between XLY and XRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (3 years) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLY vs. XRT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLY
XRT
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLY
XRT
Communication Services
XLY
XRT
Technology
XLY
XRT
Industrials
XLY
XRT
-
Basic Materials
XLY
-
XRT
-
Consumer Defensive
XLY
-
XRT
Energy
XLY
-
XRT
Financial Services
XLY
-
XRT
-
Healthcare
XLY
-
XRT
Real Estate
XLY
-
XRT
-
Utilities
XLY
-
XRT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLY vs. XRT — Risk / Return Rank
XLY
XRT
XLY vs. XRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLY | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.11 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.47 | 0.89 | -0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.40 | 2.02 | -0.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLY vs. XRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLY drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, smaller than the maximum XRT drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLY and XRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLY | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.05% | -65.81% | +6.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.98% | -13.53% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.01% | -25.62% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.67% | -44.57% | +4.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.67% | -47.02% | +7.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.28% | -11.14% | +2.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.55% | -14.99% | +5.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.97% | 5.97% | -1.00% |
Volatility
XLY vs. XRT - Volatility Comparison
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) have volatilities of 6.48% and 6.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLY | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.48% | 6.36% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.82% | 14.34% | -0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.55% | 20.60% | -2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.91% | 26.93% | -3.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.09% | 27.19% | -5.10% |
XLY vs. XRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than XRT's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLY vs. XRT - Dividend Comparison
XLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, which matches XRT's 0.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.79% | 0.79% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.28% | 1.34% | 1.20% | 1.71% | 1.43% |
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | 0.79% | 0.77% | 1.52% | 1.40% | 2.15% | 1.55% | 1.01% | 1.57% | 1.51% | 1.52% | 1.36% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLY and XRT have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLY has higher volatility (6.48%) compared to XRT (6.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLY dropped -59.05% vs XRT's -65.81%.
On 10-year performance, XLY leads with 12.73% vs 9.25% for XRT. On fees, XLY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, XRT has been the lower-risk option at 6.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLY has performed better with a 12.73% return vs 9.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XRT.
XLY and XRT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.79%.
XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, while XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLY and 0.35% for XRT.
XRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLY and XRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer