PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLY vs. XRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLY vs. XRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLY achieves a -2.39% return, which is significantly lower than XRT's 5.78% return. Over the past 10 years, XLY has outperformed XRT with an annualized return of 12.33%, while XRT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.06% annualized return.


XLY

1D
3.29%
1M
-0.88%
6M
-3.81%
YTD
-2.39%
1Y
8.28%
3Y*
11.47%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*
12.33%
ALL TIME*
9.58%

XRT

1D
-0.88%
1M
1.95%
6M
4.50%
YTD
5.78%
1Y
16.25%
3Y*
11.34%
5Y*
0.37%
10Y*
9.06%
ALL TIME*
9.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$945.87M$987.54M$948.83M
$422.92M$379.59M$454.03M

XLY vs. XRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
-2.39%7.37%26.51%39.64%-36.27%27.93%29.63%28.39%1.58%22.82%
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
5.78%8.07%11.78%21.53%-31.64%42.60%41.91%14.12%-8.04%4.22%

Correlation

The correlation between XLY and XRT is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006

0.79

The correlation between XLY and XRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLY vs. XRT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLY
XRT

Consumer Cyclical

97.1%
75.2%

Communication Services

1.7%
1.8%

Technology

1.1%
2.7%

Industrials

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

18.7%

Energy

-

1.3%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

1.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLY
97.1%
XRT
75.2%

Communication Services

XLY
1.7%
XRT
1.8%

Technology

XLY
1.1%
XRT
2.7%

Industrials

XLY
0.1%
XRT

-

Basic Materials

XLY

-

XRT

-

Consumer Defensive

XLY

-

XRT
18.7%

Energy

XLY

-

XRT
1.3%

Financial Services

XLY

-

XRT

-

Healthcare

XLY

-

XRT
1.6%

Real Estate

XLY

-

XRT

-

Utilities

XLY

-

XRT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLY vs. XRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XLY
XLY Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLY Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
XLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLY Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

XRT
XRT Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRT Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
XRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRT Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XLY vs. XRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLYXRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.14

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

1.14

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.03

2.57

-1.55

XLY vs. XRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLY Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the XRT Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLY and XRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLY vs. XRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLY drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, smaller than the maximum XRT drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLY and XRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLYXRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.05%

-65.81%

+6.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.98%

-13.53%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.01%

-25.62%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.67%

-44.57%

+4.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.67%

-47.02%

+7.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.40%

-7.00%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.54%

-14.95%

+5.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.53%

5.97%

-0.44%

Volatility

XLY vs. XRT - Volatility Comparison

Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) has a higher volatility of 7.28% compared to SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) at 6.04%. This indicates that XLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLYXRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.28%

6.04%

+1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.04%

14.92%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.53%

20.84%

-1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.07%

26.89%

-2.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.18%

27.20%

-5.02%

XLY vs. XRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than XRT's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLY vs. XRT - Dividend Comparison

XLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, more than XRT's 0.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.78%0.79%0.72%0.78%1.00%0.53%0.82%1.28%1.34%1.20%1.71%1.43%
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
0.75%0.77%1.52%1.40%2.15%1.55%1.01%1.57%1.51%1.52%1.36%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLY and XRT have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLY has higher volatility (7.28%) compared to XRT (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLY dropped -59.05% vs XRT's -65.81%.

On 10-year performance, XLY leads with 12.33% vs 9.06% for XRT. On fees, XLY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, XRT has been the lower-risk option at 6.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLY has performed better with a 12.33% return vs 9.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XRT.

XLY has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.75% for XRT.

XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, while XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry Index. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLY and 0.35% for XRT.

XRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLY and XRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer