XLII vs. VIS
XLII (State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and VIS (Vanguard Industrials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while VIS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. XLII is actively managed, while VIS is passively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XLII charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VIS.
Performance
XLII vs. VIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLII achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly lower than VIS's 14.63% return.
XLII
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- 6.73%
- 6M
- 8.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VIS
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 14.63%
- 6M
- 15.23%
- 1Y
- 26.72%
- 3Y*
- 22.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.60%
- 10Y*
- 14.06%
XLII vs. VIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 6.73% | 6.62% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 14.63% | 3.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLII and VIS is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.95 |
XLII vs. VIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLII
VIS
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
XLII
VIS
Basic Materials
XLII
-
VIS
Communication Services
XLII
-
VIS
Consumer Cyclical
XLII
-
VIS
Consumer Defensive
XLII
-
VIS
-
Energy
XLII
-
VIS
Healthcare
XLII
-
VIS
Industrials
XLII
-
VIS
Real Estate
XLII
-
VIS
Technology
XLII
-
VIS
Utilities
XLII
-
VIS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLII vs. VIS — Risk / Return Rank
XLII
VIS
XLII vs. VIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLII | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.44 | 0.52 | +0.92 |
Drawdowns
XLII vs. VIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLII drawdown since its inception was -10.10%, smaller than the maximum VIS drawdown of -63.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLII and VIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLII | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.10% | -63.51% | +53.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -1.22% | +0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.34% | -8.38% | +7.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.96% | — |
Volatility
XLII vs. VIS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLII | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.55% | 16.42% | -4.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.55% | 18.35% | -6.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.55% | 20.43% | -8.88% |
XLII vs. VIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLII has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VIS's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLII vs. VIS - Dividend Comparison
XLII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.29%, more than VIS's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 0.89% | 1.01% | 1.23% | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 1.94% |
XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 11.29% | 5.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, XLII and VIS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VIS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VIS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLII.
XLII has the higher dividend yield at 11.29%, compared with 0.89% for VIS.
XLII is categorized as Derivative Income, while VIS is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLII and 0.10% for VIS.
Find the right allocation for XLII and VIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer