VIS vs. FIDU
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU).
VIS and FIDU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VIS is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. It was launched on Sep 23, 2004. FIDU is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. Both VIS and FIDU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VIS or FIDU.
Key characteristics
| VIS | FIDU | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 25.77% | 25.39% |
| 1Y Return | 42.09% | 41.42% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 11.51% | 11.52% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 14.00% | 14.35% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 11.84% | 12.07% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.89 | 2.88 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.03 | 4.02 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.51 | 1.50 |
| Calmar Ratio | 5.63 | 5.86 |
| Martin Ratio | 19.36 | 19.19 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.18% | 2.16% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.58% | 14.41% |
| Max Drawdown | -63.51% | -42.31% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.04% | -1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIS and FIDU is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VIS vs. FIDU - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VIS having a 25.77% return and FIDU slightly lower at 25.39%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VIS having a 11.84% annualized return and FIDU not far ahead at 12.07%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VIS vs. FIDU - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FIDU's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VIS vs. FIDU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VIS vs. FIDU - Dividend Comparison
VIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, which matches FIDU's 1.17% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 1.16% | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.69% | 1.91% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 1.94% | 1.57% | 1.06% |
FIDU Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF | 1.17% | 1.42% | 1.48% | 1.12% | 1.28% | 1.73% | 1.99% | 1.60% | 1.63% | 1.98% | 1.55% | 0.31% |
Drawdowns
VIS vs. FIDU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIS drawdown since its inception was -63.51%, which is greater than FIDU's maximum drawdown of -42.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIS and FIDU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VIS vs. FIDU - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) have volatilities of 5.37% and 5.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.