VIS vs. XLI
VIS (Vanguard Industrials ETF) and XLI (Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both Industrials Equities funds - VIS tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index while XLI tracks the Industrial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VIS returned 14.60%/yr vs 14.55%/yr for XLI. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VIS charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLI.
Performance
VIS vs. XLI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIS achieves a 17.02% return, which is significantly higher than XLI's 15.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VIS having a 14.60% annualized return and XLI not far behind at 14.55%.
VIS
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- 3.63%
- YTD
- 17.02%
- 6M
- 15.14%
- 1Y
- 28.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.20%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 14.60%
XLI
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- YTD
- 15.45%
- 6M
- 14.08%
- 1Y
- 25.43%
- 3Y*
- 21.67%
- 5Y*
- 13.47%
- 10Y*
- 14.55%
VIS vs. XLI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 17.02% | 18.57% | 16.85% | 22.50% | -8.57% | 20.80% | 12.34% | 30.09% | -14.01% | 21.47% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 15.45% | 19.35% | 17.31% | 18.13% | -5.57% | 21.08% | 10.91% | 29.08% | -13.25% | 23.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIS and XLI is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2004 | 0.98 |
The correlation between VIS and XLI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
VIS vs. XLI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VIS
XLI
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Industrials
VIS
XLI
Technology
VIS
XLI
Utilities
VIS
XLI
Consumer Cyclical
VIS
XLI
Financial Services
VIS
XLI
-
Energy
VIS
XLI
-
Basic Materials
VIS
XLI
-
Communication Services
VIS
XLI
-
Real Estate
VIS
XLI
-
Healthcare
VIS
XLI
-
Consumer Defensive
VIS
-
XLI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIS vs. XLI — Risk / Return Rank
VIS
XLI
VIS vs. XLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VIS | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.27 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 2.09 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.68 | 8.24 | +1.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VIS vs. XLI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIS drawdown since its inception was -63.51%, roughly equal to the maximum XLI drawdown of -62.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIS and XLI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIS | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.51% | -62.26% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.29% | -12.21% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.80% | -18.49% | -2.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.96% | -21.64% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.42% | -42.33% | -0.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -2.01% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.36% | -9.19% | +0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 3.09% | -0.12% |
Volatility
VIS vs. XLI - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) has a higher volatility of 6.60% compared to Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) at 6.25%. This indicates that VIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIS | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.60% | 6.25% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.33% | 13.67% | +0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.37% | 16.33% | +1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.49% | 17.55% | +0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.46% | 20.02% | +0.44% |
VIS vs. XLI - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIS has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than XLI's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VIS vs. XLI - Dividend Comparison
VIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than XLI's 1.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 0.87% | 1.01% | 1.23% | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 1.94% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.16% | 1.29% | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.63% | 1.25% | 1.55% | 1.94% | 2.15% | 1.77% | 2.07% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, VIS and XLI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VIS has higher volatility (6.60%) compared to XLI (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIS dropped -63.51% vs XLI's -62.26%.
On 10-year performance, VIS leads with 14.60% vs 14.55% for XLI. On fees, XLI is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLI has been the lower-risk option at 6.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIS has performed better with a 14.60% return vs 14.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLI is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VIS.
XLI has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.87% for VIS.
VIS tracks MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index, while XLI tracks Industrial Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VIS and 0.08% for XLI.
VIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIS and XLI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer