PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIS vs. XLI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIS vs. XLI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIS achieves a 17.02% return, which is significantly higher than XLI's 15.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VIS having a 14.60% annualized return and XLI not far behind at 14.55%.


VIS

1D
-2.14%
1M
3.63%
YTD
17.02%
6M
15.14%
1Y
28.65%
3Y*
22.20%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
14.60%

XLI

1D
-2.01%
1M
3.97%
YTD
15.45%
6M
14.08%
1Y
25.43%
3Y*
21.67%
5Y*
13.47%
10Y*
14.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIS vs. XLI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIS
Vanguard Industrials ETF
17.02%18.57%16.85%22.50%-8.57%20.80%12.34%30.09%-14.01%21.47%
XLI
Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund
15.45%19.35%17.31%18.13%-5.57%21.08%10.91%29.08%-13.25%23.98%

Correlation

The correlation between VIS and XLI is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2004

0.98

The correlation between VIS and XLI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

VIS vs. XLI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIS
XLI

Industrials

90.2%
91.2%

Technology

4.2%
3.7%

Utilities

3.8%
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

1.1%
0.5%

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Energy

0.2%

-

Basic Materials

0.1%

-

Communication Services

0.0%

-

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Industrials

VIS
90.2%
XLI
91.2%

Technology

VIS
4.2%
XLI
3.7%

Utilities

VIS
3.8%
XLI
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VIS
1.1%
XLI
0.5%

Financial Services

VIS
0.2%
XLI

-

Energy

VIS
0.2%
XLI

-

Basic Materials

VIS
0.1%
XLI

-

Communication Services

VIS
0.0%
XLI

-

Real Estate

VIS
0.0%
XLI

-

Healthcare

VIS
0.0%
XLI

-

Consumer Defensive

VIS

-

XLI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIS vs. XLI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIS
VIS Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
VIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIS Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
VIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIS Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

XLI
XLI Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
XLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLI Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLI Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIS vs. XLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VISXLIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.27

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

2.09

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.68

8.24

+1.44

VIS vs. XLI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIS Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the XLI Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIS and XLI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VIS vs. XLI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIS drawdown since its inception was -63.51%, roughly equal to the maximum XLI drawdown of -62.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIS and XLI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VISXLIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.51%

-62.26%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.29%

-12.21%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.80%

-18.49%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.96%

-21.64%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.42%

-42.33%

-0.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.14%

-2.01%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.36%

-9.19%

+0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

3.09%

-0.12%

Volatility

VIS vs. XLI - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) has a higher volatility of 6.60% compared to Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) at 6.25%. This indicates that VIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VISXLIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.60%

6.25%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.33%

13.67%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.37%

16.33%

+1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.49%

17.55%

+0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.46%

20.02%

+0.44%

VIS vs. XLI - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIS has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than XLI's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VIS vs. XLI - Dividend Comparison

VIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than XLI's 1.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VIS
Vanguard Industrials ETF
0.87%1.01%1.23%1.36%1.52%1.11%1.38%1.68%1.90%1.60%1.81%1.94%
XLI
Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.16%1.29%1.44%1.63%1.63%1.25%1.55%1.94%2.15%1.77%2.07%2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, VIS and XLI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VIS has higher volatility (6.60%) compared to XLI (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIS dropped -63.51% vs XLI's -62.26%.

On 10-year performance, VIS leads with 14.60% vs 14.55% for XLI. On fees, XLI is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLI has been the lower-risk option at 6.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VIS has performed better with a 14.60% return vs 14.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLI is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VIS.

XLI has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.87% for VIS.

VIS tracks MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index, while XLI tracks Industrial Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VIS and 0.08% for XLI.

VIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIS and XLI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer