PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIS vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIS vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIS achieves a 17.02% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, VIS has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 14.60%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.


VIS

1D
-2.14%
1M
3.63%
YTD
17.02%
6M
15.14%
1Y
28.65%
3Y*
22.20%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
14.60%

VOO

1D
-1.42%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
8.19%
6M
7.24%
1Y
23.69%
3Y*
20.78%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIS vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIS
Vanguard Industrials ETF
17.02%18.57%16.85%22.50%-8.57%20.80%12.34%30.09%-14.01%21.47%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.19%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between VIS and VOO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.86

The correlation between VIS and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VIS vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIS
VOO

Industrials

90.2%
7.6%

Technology

4.2%
39.1%

Utilities

3.8%
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

1.1%
9.8%

Financial Services

0.2%
10.9%

Energy

0.2%
3.2%

Basic Materials

0.1%
1.7%

Communication Services

0.0%
10.5%

Real Estate

0.0%
1.8%

Healthcare

0.0%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.5%

Industrials

VIS
90.2%
VOO
7.6%

Technology

VIS
4.2%
VOO
39.1%

Utilities

VIS
3.8%
VOO
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VIS
1.1%
VOO
9.8%

Financial Services

VIS
0.2%
VOO
10.9%

Energy

VIS
0.2%
VOO
3.2%

Basic Materials

VIS
0.1%
VOO
1.7%

Communication Services

VIS
0.0%
VOO
10.5%

Real Estate

VIS
0.0%
VOO
1.8%

Healthcare

VIS
0.0%
VOO
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

VIS

-

VOO
4.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIS vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIS
VIS Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
VIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIS Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
VIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIS Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIS vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VISVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.35

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

2.67

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.68

11.96

-2.28

VIS vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIS Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIS and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VIS vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIS drawdown since its inception was -63.51%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIS and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VISVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.51%

-33.99%

-29.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.29%

-8.90%

-3.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.80%

-18.69%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.96%

-24.52%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.42%

-33.99%

-8.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.14%

-3.14%

+1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.36%

-3.68%

-4.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

1.99%

+0.98%

Volatility

VIS vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) has a higher volatility of 6.60% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.83%. This indicates that VIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VISVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.60%

4.83%

+1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.33%

9.82%

+4.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.37%

12.46%

+4.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.49%

16.91%

+1.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.46%

18.02%

+2.44%

VIS vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIS has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VIS vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

VIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than VOO's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VIS
Vanguard Industrials ETF
0.87%1.01%1.23%1.36%1.52%1.11%1.38%1.68%1.90%1.60%1.81%1.94%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VIS and VOO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VIS has higher volatility (6.60%) compared to VOO (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIS dropped -63.51% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.61% vs 14.60% for VIS. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.61% return vs 14.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VIS.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.87% for VIS.

VIS is categorized as Industrials Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. VIS tracks MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VIS and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIS and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer