XEMD vs. FLTR
XEMD (BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF) and FLTR (VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XEMD is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Liquid 1-10 Y Maturity Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FLTR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XEMD returned 10.14%/yr vs 5.95%/yr for FLTR. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XEMD charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLTR.
Performance
XEMD vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XEMD achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly lower than FLTR's 2.70% return.
XEMD
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -0.62%
- 6M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 8.88%
- 3Y*
- 10.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.24%
FLTR
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 1Y
- 5.04%
- 3Y*
- 5.95%
- 5Y*
- 4.63%
- 10Y*
- 3.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $35.76M | $33.35M | $28.52M | |
| $5.44M | $11.46M | $8.01M |
XEMD vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF | 2.49% | 13.98% | 8.77% | 10.26% | 2.40% |
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 2.70% | 5.22% | 7.38% | 7.41% | 2.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEMD and FLTR is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2022 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XEMD vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank
XEMD
FLTR
XEMD vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) and VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XEMD | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -9.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 2.96 | -1.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 16.15 | -13.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.95 | 95.31 | -84.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XEMD vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEMD drawdown since its inception was -10.01%, smaller than the maximum FLTR drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEMD and FLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XEMD | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.01% | -17.84% | +7.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.52% | -0.31% | -3.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.23% | -1.93% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -3.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.96% | 0.00% | -0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.23% | -0.67% | -0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.81% | 0.05% | +0.76% |
Volatility
XEMD vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) has a higher volatility of 0.96% compared to VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 0.17%. This indicates that XEMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XEMD | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.96% | 0.17% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.80% | 0.65% | +3.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.74% | 0.80% | +3.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.80% | 2.13% | +4.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.80% | 5.00% | +1.80% |
XEMD vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XEMD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
XEMD vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
XEMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, more than FLTR's 4.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 4.63% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF | 5.82% | 6.15% | 6.30% | 6.19% | 3.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XEMD and FLTR have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XEMD has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to FLTR (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XEMD dropped -10.01% vs FLTR's -17.84%.
On 3-year performance, XEMD leads with 10.14% vs 5.95% for FLTR. On fees, FLTR is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, FLTR has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XEMD has performed better with a 10.14% return vs 5.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLTR is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for XEMD.
XEMD has the higher dividend yield at 5.82%, compared with 4.63% for FLTR.
XEMD is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while FLTR is Corporate Bonds. XEMD tracks JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Liquid 1-10 Y Maturity Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FLTR tracks MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for XEMD and 0.14% for FLTR.
FLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.40 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XEMD and FLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer